writing a research proposal

writing a research proposal

Writing a Research Proposal

1. Introduction

Writing a research proposal can be an extensive task and it needs to be broken down. There are several different ideas about how to approach it but regardless of how it is organized, it must always answer the basic research questions. The proposal is the most important document that you submit as part of the application process. It gives you an opportunity to demonstrate that you have the aptitude for graduate level research, for example, by demonstrating that you have the ability to communicate complex ideas clearly, concisely, and critically. The proposal also helps us to match your research interest with an appropriate supervisor. Failure to submit a well-thought-out and interesting proposal at this stage can have a knock-on effect leading to rejection of your application or an unfavorable assignment of supervisor. In my experience, writing is the most important and challenging part of the proposal. Here you will be judged on your grasp of the subject, the methods you have chosen to employ in your research, and by the implications and ideas of your research. All research proposals must address the question of what you are trying to accomplish and why you are doing it.

2. Research Objectives

A research proposal is a specifically structured document that describes an idea for an investigation and seeks approval from an academic or operational sponsor. Research proposals have a limit on words or pages, so you won’t be able to analyze the whole existing body of literature. Choose key research papers or public documents and explain clearly how your research will either fill a gap, complete, or follow on from previous research, even if it is a new topic. For some research projects, one of the last sections to be written, although it is the most important, is the implications for practice (or change) section. This is because this is the section that will not only be read to get a basic idea of the research aims and objectives but also will be referred to again and again by the person or organization funding the research to make sure the project is still on course, will achieve the aims stated, and to make sure that it will be accepted. This section therefore has a large impact on whether the proposal is accepted or rejected and should be taken very seriously.

3. Research Methodology

The methodology is described in great detail, with a clear rationale for each choice. In order to gain a better insight into the inner context of the community and take a close look into people’s beliefs, attitudes, and their way of life, the research will use the ethnographic approach. This is a flexible method allowing the researcher to gain an understanding of people’s thoughts and feelings on particular topics, usually in an informal setup. This is often carried out by observation and informal interviewing. By taking conversation with individuals from the community that this research is concerned with, and observing events and situations local to them in understanding the responses. This will involve gaining access to the group of people and establishing a presence within the community, which is the main focus of the research. This will provide an easier way to explore the behavior and culture of people in a real setting, so the best possible information can be obtained on their subjective understanding of the worlds they live in. This is a key concern with the researcher trying to understand what the community feels is right and wrong, attitudes and opinions on wider society, and what affects their way of life. The advantage of conducting ethnography is the ability to see and hear things firsthand, and most understanding is reached from the interpretation of what has been observed.

4. Expected Results

The purpose behind this research is to analyze whether or not popular mainstream music has an effect on an adolescent’s body image or if variables such as self-esteem and image in the family household have a greater influence. This proposal will give a clear indication as to whether or not a causal comparative research is feasible. First, an extensive literature review will be conducted to examine the relationship that variables have with body image today. After analyzing and comparing data from the literature review, a hypothesis predicting that teens who place high importance on popular music will have lower body image will be developed. A second hypothesis will be that inadequate family function and low self-esteem will also bring about lower body image with no dependence on music. A statistical instrument such as a path analysis or a regression analysis will shed light on which variable has a greater effect on body image, thus determining what kind of comparative research will be the best fit.

5. Conclusion

Writing a research proposal offers a clear and comprehensive guide to the process of writing a research proposal, and the book will be of great value to students of all ages as well as to teachers of writing. Both work from the principle that every step of the proposal process should be a part of the learning experience. That is, it should involve at least one drafting and revision. Students can apply the recommendations of this text to their proof of this is responding to the reviewers of an initial unfunded proposal by revising and resubmitting the same proposal. This text grew out of an ongoing effort to improve the first to the second author’s Master’s students in the general framework it offers has been used to guide research students in fields as diverse as Speech and Hearing Sciences, Electrical Engineering, and Microbiology in addition to field work. Finally, feedback from colleagues in many fields has led to this general approach. This text will give undergraduate students a solid understanding of the research process as well as the confidence to actually begin a research proposal. Confidence is defined as the reasoned belief in one’s ability to achieve the stated goal. Confidence is critical to effective proposal writing because it shows in the choice of feasible goals, the costs allocation decisions. Given the hidden potential costs to implementation and the ability to attract a positive answer on at least some of the questions addressed to colleagues or resource people. The expected proposal. Confidence also affects the will and drive necessary for a good job. Confidence and a solid understanding of the research process “Rushing into writing a proposal without first understanding the complex experiences it intends to narrate reflects a lack of understanding of the research process as a whole” has often been seen in the first drafts of proposals from the second authors students who then write better proposals in funded resubmissions.