write my article review

write my article review

The Importance of Writing a Persuasive Article Review

1. Introduction

The goal of the article review is to learn and also give an evaluation of the article’s topic and how it pertains to the reader. Students should write their evaluation discussing research and theories that they have learned in their area of study and compare the relative information in the article. This can strengthen a student’s understanding of their field and allow them to see where the article fits in. Another goal of a review is to provide a brief explanation for the article’s relevance to the issue being discussed in class. All of these aspects are important when looking at an article’s credibility and how the information can benefit one’s self and others.

The importance of requiring students to write article reviews is this is a tool which checks if a student has actually read the article, as well as verifies if the student understood the article. A good article review is written so that someone who has not read the article will be able to understand the main points that the author has attempted to express. At that point, the reviewer must assess the article in relation to the information that they are learning in their area of study.

An open mind, and eye for useful information, and an urge to make a change are all key factors to writing a good article review. With the world hungering for credible and reliable knowledge, it is very important that one is able to recognize an honest piece of work.

Sadly enough, high schools and universities are filled with teachers and professors who are more concerned about their personal agendas. No student wants to hear that their paper is one of twenty, rather the student wants to be viewed as special and unique. A way in which the teacher or professor can verify the validity of information within the article is to conduct some sort of peer review.

2. Understanding the Purpose of an Article Review

A paragraph, and even a summary of an article, may be written for a variety of reasons but the main reason is to include the information necessary for the original author to be able to understand fully the context in which the article was written. This will help the author understand how the article is received by readers and if it is effective in communicating. What is the author’s central idea? Not every article is going to be read and understood in the same way by every reader. In other words, there is no simple straightforward answer to what an author’s central idea is or what an article’s evidence or conclusions are. These are often complex questions that matter a great deal and it is quite possible that the author has never really thought about what it is that they are trying to communicate in writing the article. It is important for the reviewer to understand what the author is attempting to communicate. Although it can sometimes be difficult to identify what the author’s central idea is, it is usually presented somewhere near the beginning of the article. Answers to this question can be used to the benefit of the article’s author.

3. Key Elements of an Effective Article Review

One of the common failures of an article review is its lack of organization. This is due to a similar problem as identified in focus. That is, the work being reviewed does not have a clear organization or is poorly organized, hence the review usually follows the organization of the work. This is ineffective if the work being reviewed is poorly organized. As such, to produce an effective review, one will first summarize the work in a way that shows the reader that they understand the work with special attention being placed on the thesis and topic sentences within the work. Then the review can reorganize the summary in a more coherent manner while making sure to point out weaknesses of the current organization. The organized summary can now be used as a guideline to addressing individual parts of the work in the same order as the original.

The focus of an article review is usually the most difficult to define. This is because often the author does not state a clear thesis, and instead, the review must deduce the thesis from the work. An effective way to do this is to ask the writer to write down in one sentence what the main point of the work is. The review should then be able to use that sentence as a guideline in order to state the thesis of the work being reviewed. The review also may come up with their own thesis and compare it to the thesis of the work. This is an effective way of analyzing the work as it makes the review put the thesis of the work into context.

An effective article review is not just a simple summary; it is a constructive analysis used to make an argument. When writing an effective review, one must take into account the following key elements: focus, organization, support and evidence, and critique.

4. Tips for Writing a Persuasive Article Review

1. Understand the Article To understand the article means to be able to understand the content on the superficial level, but also more importantly to comprehend what the author is trying to convey. This can be achieved by reading the effective headline and subheadline, and then skim reading the total content to get an overview. After doing this, the true reading can then begin by reading the entire content and jotting down anything important. At a minimum, an article review should be able to provide the reader with a brief summarization of the content of the article reviewed and explain anything that the reader learned through the process. This, of course, requires comprehension as a prequel to reviewing the article. Therefore, it is easier to review an article on a topic that is familiar. In order to do this for an article that is not a primary source and is on a known topic, the student may first need to do some additional research to become familiar with the topic.

To write an effective persuasive article review, it is important to first understand what it is. As can be gleaned from the name, an article review is a discussion on a particular article. It can be a primary source or just an article that talks about something significant. It is a summarization, classification, analysis, and evaluation of what the student has learned from the particular article. Different students and academics have different views on what article review really is. In order to write a persuasive article review, it is important to understand what an article review is and the steps involved in writing one. These are as follows:

5. Conclusion

A warrant is the underlying reasoning that connects the data to the claim. It is the most important part of an argument, and an article is only persuasive if the reader accepts the warrants for the arguments, but it is often assumed and hence overlooked. Therefore, a warrant should be noted for each argument to remind the writer, and it may be useful to add this as a tip to the article. At the postgraduate level, it has been suggested that Toulmin’s method of argument is effective, and learning to write persuasively is the best way to understand the theory. Therefore, more information on this may be useful in writing a very persuasive article.

Steps involved in the pre-writing phase have also been highlighted. The article has focused on researching the issue and the audience and has revealed research on arguments. This is a systematic way to prepare for an article, and it is true that having a good understanding of the issue and knowing what arguments are likely to be successful will make writing the article easier. But a simpler method is offered by Ramage and Bean’s The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Writing, which suggests making an outline of the article and deciding what pattern of development is being used for each argument. This too is highly effective to make the writing easier, and it may be useful to make a comparison between the two methods and find which one works best. Step three has been grossly overlooked: the warrant for the arguments.

The issue that you have to know your audience should be extended as it directly affects the success of an article in persuading its readers. Different people have different beliefs, values, and attitudes that can be positive or negative towards the article’s issue.

This article review has highlighted the critical issue of persuasive writing in society and offered some suggestions for preparing to write and writing an article that will result in a change of readers’ beliefs or actions. While the key points in the article are useful and practical, few evidences are lacking to support the claims, as the article seems to be the author’s own views. There are abundant examples of persuasive writing, ranging from editorials and papers to advertisements and political speeches. It would be beneficial to analyze the certain area of persuasive writing, for instance, an advertisement or campaign on convincing people to stop an action.