write article review for me

write article review for me

The Importance of Writing Article Reviews

1. Introduction

Understand the article The very first step is to understand the article that you are going to review, and this is best done by a reflective reading of the article. Make incidental notes while reading the article to give an undeveloped idea of the article. Now you have a fair idea of what the article is trying to demonstrate, and thus you can jot down a few points about what has been read. This is a vain step as article reviews often than not are done hours before the submission. At this point, one can run through their previously written incidental notes and do the review. Gather adequate knowledge on what the author’s intent is, what he’s trying to demonstrate, the main points in the article, the chronology of events shown, any subliminal noun alliteration that has been done, and the atmosphere of the article in your mind. After analyzing all the 5 W’s and H, one can say that he has a good understanding of the article and may proceed to the next step.

Welcome to the wonderful world of writing article reviews! Writing an article review is a fun and challenging task. It is interesting to think that this is a series of tasks, where the article will undergo critical review. Writing an article review is not just about expressing your opinion on the work. It is a deep analysis of the article. An article review is a written work where you summarize, assess, organize, and concur with the facts you have information from. The primary objective of this article is to give a step-by-step guidance on writing an article review on any assigned article. Now, we presume that you have an article at hand, and our first step would be understanding the article and generating an interesting title. In many cases, tutors give an assigned article along with an article review worksheet. Now, this is to make your task easier and to enforce students into deep understanding of the exhibit an inclusive review. This will give an easier view on how the article review has to be done since it will run in the back of your mind.

2. Benefits of Writing Article Reviews

Each article offers its own value in writing an article review, but there are general reasons to write an article. An article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess someone else’s article. This involves writing, so it is a more difficult task than writing a summary. To identify certain points that you need to write a review, not everyone will see your point. Even though this is someone else’s work, we can share our understanding and identify certain articles. This will make others understand better and this can also improve other ideas from different reviews. The article to be reviewed should be the result of research in the field which was the main focus of the piece. This will offer another opinion, this can be the first argument of someone else’s article and so on. Step by step, the criticism and the queries can become constructive criticism that the article’s author can learn from. This can also bring negative points, but these negative points can encourage the author. There are several types of article reviews, from pure descriptive to more critical and analytical. The descriptive summary should give the reader a general sense of what the article is about and the author’s main points. In an evaluative summary, you weigh the article’s strengths and weaknesses against what you perceive is its purpose. An interpretive summary not only evaluates the article but also comments on how the article applies to a person’s life, opinions, or scholarship. In order to write a good review, we should identify the article first, check its background, skim to understand the points, and then finally read the article thoroughly.

3. How to Write an Effective Article Review

To write an effective article review, you should first read the article through two or more times, taking notes on the author’s main points, arguments, and supporting evidence. Though the first reading is important, in your review, you should quote sparingly from the article itself, choosing the most significant or vivid points. To preserve the author’s tone, you should follow the quote with the words “the author suggests” or “the author believes.” Using quotes without this commentary can lead to the problem of a paper being top heavy on quotes, rather than content. Many students simply do not have enough practice in writing article reviews, and as a result, they can waste time using quotes that are largely irrelevant to the article’s main points. Remember, the goal here is to keep your review concise, yet thorough. After taking notes, move on to the evaluation and analysis. Step back and look objectively at the article. What are the author’s main points? What is their purpose for writing? Did they convince you, and why? These are a few of the beginning questions to ask. Next, consider the array of evidence the author uses to support the main points and implications the author makes. If these are difficult to discern, do they reflect the article’s organizational structure? Now is the time to get out the notes from the first reading. What was particularly significant, and how do you know? It may be that a point just seemed but was not really convincing, or was not enough info to make the judgment. And it may be that there were implications, but not readily identifiable ones. Reasoning and reflection will come back to these notes, however many of them will come to mind on the next step, which is writing the review. After determining and reflecting on the author’s main points and argument, it is time to begin the writing. Make an outline around the points to be sure that they are clearly addressed. Non-customary articles often times present an arrangement to challenges that may not be readily identifiable, so take care to construct the reasons for the agreement and disagreement. Again, this point is very crucial. Assumptions are written on a lot in lower level educations, however judgment and especially backing judgment is an operation often taken for granted. The conclusion of the article may not necessarily state the author’s main points and argument. Also, it can be a place to direct on the author’s part, drawing together the article’s info with the assumptions of the author. If the critique is to be informative, the conclusion is an appropriate place to have a summary of the article being reviewed. And finally, as with any good piece of writing, revise it, and be sure to fix any grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. Many of these items can subsist given a good dissertation to the questions above. This will serve not only as quality insurance but will render the notes on evaluating the article, as it can answer to doubting what parts caused an error.

4. Tips for Writing a Persuasive Article Review

For a critique, state the main idea of the article back to the reader in your own words. Then you will include a paragraph or two having identified a couple of areas of the article, you feel were particularly well done or particularly poorly done. Finally give a section of the article saying if you agree or disagree with the author and your reasons why – you can use direct references to the article in this section.

For a summary, briefly and concisely state the main idea of the article. This should take one paragraph.

In a summary, you are giving the outline of the article, so the reader would have to read the article to find out the details. In a critique, you are analyzing the article and telling the reader whether you agree with the article. You will have to decide on the areas that the article did well, areas where it could improve, and then your overall opinion. You may also want to write a more detailed evidence to support your opinion.

Spend some time planning and thinking before writing a review. Decide what kind of review you are writing. Will it be a summary or a critique?

5. Conclusion

It is likely that at some point in your career, you will be required to write an article review. The reasons for this are endless. Authors often have colleagues submit a written review on an article to give their external evaluation of their work. Article reviews are frequently used as tests to see if you can read an article, understand its content, then interpret the article’s findings into an understandable, concise essay. This skill will be imperative for those majoring in a field of science, as there are constantly new findings being documented and summarized. If you display competency in your review, it may lead to great future success. But most importantly, through various stages in your life, there will be articles which contain interesting or persuasive arguments and it is very beneficial to be able to differentiate a good article from a bad one.

In conclusion, article review writing is not a very complex process, but it is very important. In simple terms, an article review essay is like a summary. However, it is not meant to be a thorough summary. It is meant to pick out the important points in the article, and determine whether the author was accurate and well supported in his or her argument, or if the author is trying to persuade the reader to agree with an unsubstantiated opinion. Like any other essay, there is a basic format for an article review. Your novel will have an introduction in which you state the thesis contained within the novel and a general idea of your stance on the thesis. And the review ends with a conclusion where you re-state the thesis, summarize the essay, and then write whether or not you agree with the thesis and why. If you can effectively understand and simplify these basic guidelines, your review should be a success. This should assist in a reader correctly interpreting an article and will give them insight on contrasting an author’s argument versus their own.