types of article reviews

types of article reviews

Types of Article Reviews: A Comprehensive Overview

1. Introduction to Article Reviews

Exceptions do occur when professors that have earned the proper scientific backgrounds use their articles as teaching materials in graduate and undergraduate courses, or when researchers try to find evidence of fraud or errors. In addition, current trends show an increase in the participation of the nonacademic public in research activities. Hence, new methodologies for conducting a review must also consider those actors.

In the present article, we define article reviews as the procedure of evaluating the quality of research of published articles within a specific area of research. Correspondingly, we define article survey as the procedure of summarizing the research in published articles within a specific area of research. The interest is to present an overview of the different types of article reviews, the various objectives they have, the types of questions they address, and the study results in terms of research contributions, general data, specific details, and other novel findings. Thus, this work has a purely methodological character, focusing on the options available for making a review and on the manner in which the result may be organized and presented.

Article reviews are a common practice in scholarly communication, beginning from when the authors submit revised versions of their work to referees, then until the manuscript is accepted and published. However, later readers, including professors, researchers, and current, are always expected to review published articles, concerning evaluating the implications of the studies for their research and/or professional practice, rather than actually conducting a review that requires a certain level of expertise.

2. Literature Review Article Reviews

Often, with topics that have reached a certain level of growth and development, the number of articles written by scholars on certain subjects becomes difficult to handle. Here is where the review article comes in. These pieces are often around 8000 words in length and are not original research taken to a logical extreme, but instead tend to target the literature base in a specific field or on a certain topic. Generally, in these articles, the author surveys the different threads in the literature and organizes it in a way that is easily understood and referenced. Some review articles concentrate on only one specific topic of the major journals on economics and management. In the end, however, the format is similar. The largest part of the article is taken up by the literature review that constitutes the paper. At the end, a review article may contain something that a conventional article typically does not, that is, a discussion about the open problems or the major unresolved issues in the literature. In this way, such papers may provide a valuable service to the academic community.

3. Systematic Review Article Reviews

There are a number of issues concerning the development and reporting of reviews. Generally, a review should ask research questions that are simultaneously broad and narrow. That is, they should encapsulate the widest possible range of potential answers to an issue. We talk about the focus of the topic rather than a focus in the field. Review questions should be sufficiently broad to cover the range of available evidence without necessarily knowing in advance what evidence will be found. However, at the same time, reviews should dispose of the largest possible number of extraneous studies. It is important to remember that it is possible for a question to generate no results or to generate lots of conflicting results. The point of review questions is not just to guide the search strategy in order to maximize the results but also to guide the reader through the report. Anyone reading a review with a well-developed research question should be able to gauge at any point in the review as to where the writers think they are on the way to developing an answer.

The key characteristics of a systematic review require a more detailed approach to structuring a review article, particularly in the presentation of the methodology and the discussion of the results. It is important to recognize that a systematic review is more than just a comprehensive, exhaustive review of the literature on a particular topic/issue, or an overview of a broad literature, or even a comprehensive literature review. A systematic review should, as best as can be done, follow a formal protocol that details all the stages of developing the theoretical focus, generating research questions, planning and running the search, screening and sorting the papers, analyzing them, and presenting and discussing the results. In addition, this style also needs to talk about the costs of the study and the time-consuming nature of high-quality systematic reviews, relating this to the depth and breadth of the research concerns and the methodological care and detail that goes into the development of the review.

4. Meta-Analysis Article Reviews

Meta-analysis is actually concerned with observational studies and randomized control trials investigating the effect of the same intervention. The core of the system comes from a computer-based research process. The novelty of the system is that it provides an easy-to-use system that solves the problem of manually looking for relationships and inconsistencies. Researchers use the system to run different search algorithms on the system in order to find as many related infobots as possible. Systematic reviews are the basis of evidence-based clinical practice. Conducting systematic reviews without meta-analysis and more independent article preparation methods require time, effort, and financial resources. The system also develops the basis of such research to analyze results and integrate results.

Meta-analysis is a popular tool in the scientific community. It is a systematic way of studying a selected topic in order to make a conclusion or to understand a specific subject better. Compared to other types of articles, meta-analysis is concerned with existing studies rather than the innovation of new concepts or research procedures. Almost every researcher feels the need for meta-analysis at some point in time. There is a great demand for automated systems to conduct meta-analysis because there are some vital administrative processes. The development of a computer system is quite essential for specialists in that particular field.

5. Critical Review Article Reviews

Despite the fact that an article review appears to be easy, it should, in fact, possess a great deal of theoretical and other kinds of thoughtful external work connected either directly or indirectly to the writing. Conversely, the five types of review articles were designed so that authors would be able to include at least some useful parts, entries to people who provide resourcefulness when searching and data assessment, and also present consultative content. All of these are attributed to an article containing a review. Any of the reviews should hold the characteristics outlined in the five types of review articles. Each type consists of some qualities meaningful when finishing other kinds of review articles. All of the reviews need some form of long debate with the examined literature and at least some review comment. All writers can also produce at least a point report for reviews completed, and it would be considered for inspection.

Critical reviews are largely analytical in content and typically provide the reader with the chance to establish the reliability of the published work. If the audience truly knows the subject, they will discover some important omissions that should be explained. Furthermore, critical reviews may highlight gaps in the existing literature, provide the basis for a new study, offer a clear guide for the establishment of meta-analytic strength, and assist in guiding researchers who are generally doctoral students undertaking their dissertation. Of note, when reviewing the literature, the critical review can have numerous sections based on questions, as shown in the structure of critical review article reviews and specifically the organizational structure. Furthermore, within the text, the review should be illustrated by means of research questions, rather than the authors simply stating the objective of the study.