the custom assignment writing company

the custom assignment writing company

Ethical Considerations in the Custom Assignment Writing Industry

1. Introduction to Custom Assignment Writing Services

Many students feel an overwhelming amount of pressure to succeed, leading some to seek out external help to meet their academic obligations. Custom assignment writing companies provide students with the academic support they need. Some argue that custom assignment writing services allow students access to additional support, nurturing academic growth and individual progression. Additionally, custom assignment writing services apparently present the opportunity to showcase and nurture student creativity and critical thinking. On the other hand, many educators argue that custom assignment writing companies are exploitative, delivering carefully-crafted assignments and assessments designed to yield the highest possible marks with minimal effort from the student. Although, we argue that this characterization is speculative and not backed by empirical evidence. These third-party organizations also potentially undermine the value and the quality of education that universities provide. Learning and academic skills are often as essential as subject knowledge acquired during a course of study, a stigma held by educators that signifies and recognizes the importance of skills development.

This section introduces the custom assignment writing service, outlining how the industry operates, the constraints within the industry, and the motivations behind the use of the service. By developing a comprehensive and detailed academic understanding of the industry, we demonstrate that the custom assignment writing industry is a viable option for high school and university students. Our research provides a unique and more detailed approach to the typical demographic explored in industry literature.

2. Ethical Issues in the Industry

Ethical concerns are widespread within the custom assignment writing industry, policing and linkages to cheating. Services may be hired by students for an array of valid reasons like time constraints, preventative measures against mental health problems, and to enhance their understanding and reduce concerns about academic success. However, commissioning a custom assignment could endanger academic integrity. While a student can use a custom essay as a research tool or resource, submitting the work would show dishonesty. Custom essays may further widen attainment between different social groups through first-generation wealth concepts. To create custom assignments may also pose ethical torments for the creators. The extent of custom essays’ shallowness is difficult to establish, which may concern writers who are confused about the likelihood to facilitate cheating. Writers are also best placed to determine the authenticity of assignments since they are part of the community of clients.

The idea of paying somebody else to do all the work that demonstrates academic ability – for which the payer alone gains credit – is unfair. Here are some unresolved arguments about the term “unfair”. The word tends to refer to people unable to afford the service because regulators are beginning to restrict external professional links. Unfair also perpetuates social privilege and can help create income barriers. A fair opportunity carries an ethical requirement to ensure that inequality of opportunity merely discounts natural and cultivated talents. High-end large enterprises may therefore have ethical duties to render the ability to compete. The authors also have responsibilities, and barriers here may furthermore restrict opportunity for further debate.

3. Regulations and Legal Frameworks

There are widespread laws and guidelines that attempt to govern the custom assignment writing industry. Many of them do not apply per se to intermediaries who provide platforms for transactions between employers and writers. However, a number of points converge. For example, UK guidelines by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) recommend that universities provide students with “clear, publicly available, written details of the relevant policies and regulations, including sources and processes of academic, personal and financial student support”. To illustrate another point of convergence, the University of Cape Town has regulations that control commercial services of “editing, typewriting, reproducing, assignment, and thesis writing or production by commercial or non-academic operators for an academic purpose” (art 4.1). Similarly, Art. 11.3 of the Eötvös Loránd University’s guidelines recommend that students be informed about writing services.

Moreover, the University of New South Wales’ policy “Statement on assignment writing assistance outsourcing and writing mills” includes the approval to distribute written materials among students: “It is recommended that you include in your statements to students… the consequences of using writing services”, such as disciplinary damages and adjustments to their conduct requirements. To carry the example a step further, Queensland University of Technology (QUT) distributed a “toomit or toomit” notice across the entire university, instructing subjects to develop practices that have fair implications for students, and learners in violation shall be treated with disrespect. To provide signposts for future research, questions about the effectiveness of such legal and quasi-legal measures should be formulated. For instance, have laws and guidelines affected students’ willingness to use custom assignment writing services? What do we know about the production/posting of law-compliant “terms and conditions, copyright and limit of responsibility” in the marketplace? Are banned terms and conditions often published, with the result that universities may have signed up for a business culture predicated on fiction?

4. Impact on Academic Integrity and Education Quality

The custom assignment writing industry poses significant ethical and practical concerns. There is a general consensus from the discussion and previous research that such services have the power to undermine education quality by at least two means. The first is compromising the standards or academic quality of the work presented by students. In industries where qualification is a requirement prior to employment or autonomous practice, work may go on to impact broader society through the commissioning of poorly trained graduates or professionals. The second is a direct threat to the knowledge and learning of the commissioning student. A map of student opinions on custom assignment writing services in four English-speaking western nations indicated that, for Engineering and Computing students, more students were in favour of a blanket ban of these services than were against them.

Custom assignment writing services are used differently in different educational sectors, but the most common usage in most sectors is part use, editing or university administration support work. Within these sectors, the impression from existing literature suggests varying opinions on the practical consequences of the use of these services. However, the most common feeling of staff and management opinion is overwhelmingly negative. Compromises to the learning environment, and educational quality, and impacts on the wider community have led to many in the academy calling for a closer look at the industry and greater regulatory interventions are necessary to limit the harm it inflicts.

5. Conclusion and Recommendations for Ethical Practices

In the case of essay mills, an international multi-stakeholder approach was taken to solve the issue. The process started in 2006 when European universities’ quality agency ENQA tackled the problem of essay mills. The Working Group Report on Ethical and Legal Positioning of Contract Cheating proposed an analytical report that fought for an EU-wide ban or restriction of such companies. According to this report, internet sites of ghostwriters should be shut down to send a message that this sort of behavior is not acceptable. As this is unlikely to happen in reality, the other measures taken into consideration were involvement to decrease the demand for essay sellers, the creation of “strategies that find regular repetition in the sanctions imposed, in the focus on prevention and on assistance to students,” and the educational measures, such as showing the potential of harming the reputation of one’s future employer may hinder the students from doing so.

Questions about which measures should be taken are very important as a first step to moving forward on this issue. The views of stakeholders presented in the paper provide useful data on how they view the problem of cheating and what solutions they think exist that might decrease the opportunities to contract cheat. In addition, various suggestions for canker, e.g., increased moderation, and the need for education about what constitutes plagiarism, are echoed elsewhere. It seems that there is growing international consensus that more needs to be done to address the root causes of contract cheating, rather than just victimizing those students who get caught. During the workshop, the stakeholders of SAHEs have made recommendations in order to improve ethical practices in the essay writing sector. These are formulated as follows: Research focused on essay writing should contribute knowledge regarding new modes of academic dishonesty and student dishonesty that affect the public sector, essay writing companies, and the private sector, in particular, consultancies. Co-regulatory acts should be examined through their legislative, administrative, and self-regulatory acts to ascertain the implications for the conduct of business in customer essay writing. Regulatory bodies overseeing examinations as to the veracity of the qualifications awarded by universities are watched to consider how they respond to and/or establish co-regulatory codes. Regulatory responses to essay writing companies include investigation, enforcement, and litigation.