sample of article review

sample of article review

The Importance of Article Reviews in Academic Research

1. Introduction

This essay is a rigorous attempt to explore that article writing is extremely significant, especially in the field of English language and literature. In the age of the internet, our familiarity with written English has increased. Writing articles in English is a tough job and it needs constant practice in order to get the desired results. Even then, it is seen that experienced writers commit mistakes while writing articles. This is due to the fact that they are not aware of the various rules and principles related to article writing. Had they been aware of these rules, it would have become easier for them to correct their mistakes. It is on account of this reason that a detailed analysis of article writing is sought. This is because if the rules of article writing are known to all, it would become convenient for us to understand English articles, poetry, and prose. And if we are able to comprehend the same, it would not be difficult for us to acquire a fair mastery over the English language. This is our sole objective. A general description of an article is that it is a piece of non-fiction writing, usually several thousand words long, which is used to inform, describe, or explain a given idea. In view of this definition, it is clear before us that an article is an orderly and methodical presentation of an event, idea, or argument. Therefore, the sole aim of an article is to create a well-constructed picture of an argument or an event. Now, when the article is the mirror of an event or idea, it is essential for a writer to understand what he wants to depict to his readers. This implies that the very first rule of article writing is to have a definite aim or purpose.

2. Benefits of Article Reviews

Entry-level professors need to create publishing records very early in their occupations, and also achieving tenure calls for strong publishing abilities. An article review assists to create the practice of writing as well as publishing narratives, as well as the review functions as a prototypical publishing vehicle. Composing a narrative and afterwards criticizing another person’s work usually ends up being a great deal more appropriate than the usual apprenticeship in the art of composing rejection letters. Critics in the academic community are most active when they are requesting for promotion as well as tenure. An article review is an obligatory section of an academician’s pursuit for the promotion. At this employment level, the faculty views itself as both a customer as well as a producer of academic analysis. Teachers ask others to review their work, while also dedicating a significant quantity of time to the review of others’ work. Article reviews give a double purpose for an active academician: the critique used effectively to one’s own analysis.

3. Guidelines for Writing an Effective Article Review

Now, critique the article, point out the areas where the author failed to deliver. This is the most important part of your review as here it shows your analyzing skills. Lastly, give a proper conclusion. Summarize your points and the thesis, and then give a verdict of the article. A well-written article review must always evoke a response from the reader, and here is where your review achieves success.

Your review must always start with an introduction. This introduction must always mention the title of the article along with the name of the author. It must then give a little background about the author and then about the article, about what prompted the author to write it. Always remember to end the introduction with your own thesis, or the main contention of your review. Then, in the subsequent paragraphs, defend your thesis using the most appropriate points. For example, if comparing two articles, then always compare the points of the first article in the same sequence. Always remember to defend your points with valid reasons and examples.

Writing an article review when you are not familiar with article writing and opinions can be a little difficult, but with some strategies, it becomes an easy job. One of the most important steps is to understand the article that you are intended to review. This does not only mean that you just comprehend it, but it also means knowing how to judge it using your analyzing skills. Next, you have to plan how well you should present your review, i.e. in points or paragraph form. Then, draft your ideas on the paper. Here, you must remember not to go off the track. This means that always stick to the article being reviewed. Going off the track lessens the relevance of your article.

4. Common Mistakes to Avoid in Article Reviews

Agreeing to do a review but not being sure why you were asked to do it. It may be that you were invited to do the review because of your expertise in a specific field, or because of your reputation as a researcher. Sometimes the editor will have a project in mind for which your work would be a good fit. This does not mean you should accept the review, but you should consider it further before making a decision. What will you learn from the review? It is very important to be clear. A good review will be informative and well-argued. A good review is not simply a glowing recommendation for the manuscript. A good reviewer will address the paper in the context of the field and the current state of the art. Is the manuscript well written? Are the claims and conclusions adequately supported by the evidence presented? A reviewer is asked to judge the manuscript on these grounds. At times a reviewer will be asked to frame his or her review in the context of a “Decision Letter” written to the author – a simple accept or reject recommendation. Although an accept or reject recommendation is helpful, the review should still consider the strengths and weaknesses of the work and provide guidance to the author, even if the recommendation is to reject. Usually the reviews that cause the most consternation to an authors are those for papers that are ultimately rejected. A reviewer has a responsibility to address the grounds for rejection with the author and to provide constructive guidance for future work.

5. Conclusion

It is essential for researchers to have awareness of article review writing techniques. While doing so, they should keep in mind the significance of these reviews in academic research and custom article writing. This awareness will help them recognize the issues in identification of the problem, question formulation, literature review, research design, and data collection, and will assist them in writing good research quality articles, research reports, theses, or dissertations. Effective article review and writing will finally help the researchers in clarifying all the issues related to identification of the problem. Through the suggestions mentioned in these reviews, they can improve the quality of their research and its related documentation. Another reason indicating the importance of article reviews in academic research is their assistance in developing scientific research and progressing the knowledge base. In the modern era, scientific research and knowledge are rapidly increasing in all academic disciplines and have become very vast in range. It has also become difficult for researchers to keep track of all the information that is relevant to their research topic. Reading the targeted article along with its review will allow the researchers to focus on the specific piece of information. This will save their time and effort and will enable them to get what they need. The suggestions presented in the review can also act as a guideline for researchers who plan to carry out similar research in the future.