research article critique example apa

research article critique example apa

A Comprehensive Guide to Writing a Research Article Critique in APA Style

1. Introduction to Research Article Critiques

Critiquing research is one way to expand understanding and perspective and is a key consideration when using research for evidence-based practice. This article describes the first stage of critiquing, that is, examining a research report. Before you read and gain knowledge from research articles, you must learn how to critique. You should be interested in the research subject, understand how to assess the research methods, and recognize how a critique is used in evidence-based practice. This first article will help you develop an understanding of how to undertake this process.

In order to write a comprehensive critique for any research article, you will need to develop a thorough understanding of the topic to be able to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the research work. In this help book, we will guide you through the process of critiquing this introductory guidance and the guidance on other parts and sections of the book. In the section to follow, we introduce you to the process of research article critiquing from definition to structure. The section also gives the general guidelines to consider when performing research article critiques across a wide variety of research disciplines and article categories.

2. Key Components of a Research Article Critique in APA Style

You can always use some descriptive keywords, which are very useful when it comes to searching for further information. The author of a research article should present a clear problem and propose a sound methodology to solve it. This is what you should concur on or disagree with. This stage proves to be the verification stage and lets you explore new ideas. I suggested revising the question. I do not want to emphasize the limitations of the article because the authors mentioned them in the article, and they chose not to explore other regions.

The main components of your critique should include a title, author’s name, date of submission, and the publication details. Additionally, the article critique should include recommendations and research. The author’s name should include his/her educational qualification and work experience. You should check the website of the Institute and the affiliations of the authors. This will help establish the educational qualifications and positions of the authors. You should send the author an email or call if you want to clarify a point in the article. The summary should be short. It should at least summarize what the article is about, how the study was conducted, the hypothesis, the implications of the findings, and how successful the study was.

3. Guidelines for Writing a Critical Analysis in APA Format

Conducting scholarly research properly requires lots of judgment, creativity, and patience. Most importantly, practice is required to develop the kind of skill necessary for careful research with a critical analysis. However, quality research is important for any kind of writing, and it is especially imperative for papers required by many academic departments and programs. Remember to check the two sections which have been especially dedicated to this style, which offer very comprehensive research style tips and suggestions. Expert writers have managed to develop a more detailed version of the strategy suggested in the link called “Scientific Method Style,” which consists of ten steps. Reflection is as important to the writing process as research, especially given that a critical analysis requires more thought than a reflective essay or an analytical essay. While you should have also developed some personal conclusions about writing your assignment before you start the research in order to narrow down your focus, these individual views can be very difficult to create on your own.

3.1 A Practical Implementation of the Style and Methods

When writing a critical analysis for your academic assignment, make sure that draft elements are effectively reviewed to assure that the final work is of superior quality. An essential part of academic works, a critical analysis makes you rethink a subject in a deeper way. Developing a critical analysis for your assignment requires certain goals for your project, creating a central claim and using evidence to support your argument, and more importantly, establishing a context for your audience. There are a variety of methods to use when it comes to a critical analysis for a subject matter, including different styles.

4. Common Mistakes to Avoid in Research Article Critiques

The critique is an increasingly crucial task that contributes to higher critical synthesis of research articles and synthesizing skills for preparing all kinds of research for publication. provides a direct answer to common questions regarding the critique process. This chapter presents APA style and formatting basics by asking students to be mindful of specific section requirements and then considering in-text citations along with reference lists and establish a manuscript’s style and unique voice to be aware of the basics. This chapter shows a crafted way to write structured and timely pieces, providing tips for how to live up to models from model authors.

This article provides a comprehensive review of critiquing research articles that is based on understanding key elements of the research article critique. This article provides an example, to a follow-up critique of a research article. The suggestions will enable students to learn to critique research articles in a systematic and scientific manner. Such feedback and revision provide students with professional development in writing and in understanding APA style. With these steps, a student will have a good basis to start the critiquing process and can better follow the peer review process.

Critiquing research articles is an important task in all areas of psychology. Critique of research articles can help students understand the journal articles and develop their writing and analytical skills. It is important to understand where weaknesses in the content of a research article may lie and know what questions to ask as alternative hypotheses or different definitions of the concepts. You may want to find out whether there is enough data to support the positive aspects and whether insufficient information was obtained based on the generally accepted value.

5. Conclusion and Final Tips for Crafting an Effective APA-Style Critique

When conducting and evaluating academic research, the quality of the development of the work carried by the authors is usually the focus. Thus, the constant academic publications and their implications are narrowed mainly at that point. However, for these investigations to contribute significantly to the creation of knowledge, it is necessary to analyze the work of others and compare their theories, models, conclusions and methodologies. The review of the works is an essential task to contrast and validate academic models and theories. Due to the work volume, the techniques for conducting a review of the literature are of the utmost importance. In addition, to present their theses regarding existing theories, authors need a great academic knowledge, and considering that not all authors possess knowledge of all existing theories and models, individuals should approach these themes and concepts already developed to generate new theories and models, which carry the characteristics of innovation and academically viable contributions.

One of the usual formats for technical or academic articles is of a research or experimental nature. Nevertheless, not all authors carry out their work excellently. The present article is drawn with the purpose of commenting and making critical recommendations on the aspects that are not usually detailed in article writing guides, however, with the intention of achieving the formation of more challenging and perfect academic publications. Normally, the instructions to the authors of scientific and technical journals set guidelines to achieve quality in the works to be presented in the style they determine. The APA style is usually mostly used by journals whose topics belong to sciences, such as technical journals of the IEEE.