public health administration

public health administration

The Importance of Public Health Administration

1. Introduction

Public health administration is also known to be very patient-oriented. Leaders in this field will almost always want to make sure their efforts lead to an improvement in the healthcare system and work directly with their consumers to see the impact of changes, whether they be positive or negative. Public health administration can also help improve the use of preventive care and refine the effectiveness and efficiency of the healthcare system. With the Affordable Care Act and its strong emphasis on preventive care, there is a growing need for administrators who can help plan and implement changes leading to better long-term health. Practice public health administration in the ACA era! This area of work can also be very rewarding and successfully foster changes in health throughout the world. From high poverty areas to recession and war times, public health administration is known to reduce the global burden of disease and ultimately provide a better world for generations to come.

Public health administration is a field that relates to management and leadership in public health organizations. It involves putting into place new policies and plans to best serve society and overcome health problems. Many government and private sector organizations are involved in this area and support the infrastructure and ongoing research in the area of public health. Administration can be the leading cause in public health advancements due to its ability to reduce costs, create advancements, and therefore increase the quality and access of healthcare to a community.

2. Roles and Responsibilities of Public Health Administrators

In order to turn this trend around, a strong network of public health administrators is needed to help the public understand the health issues and utilize resources to take action. Public health administrators must also be the catalyst within their organizations to help their workers understand the important connection between their individual efforts and the health of the public. Easier said than done: this survey identified increasing workforce diversity as another primary concern of public health administrators.

Public health has always been a hard sell. Despite the tireless and often heroic efforts of public health practitioners over the last century, most Americans do not understand the importance of public health conditions on their own lives. This confusion about the field of public health creates a barrier in recruiting the brightest college graduates into public health administration and results in inadequate public funding for programs, which, according to the same survey, is a top concern for public health administrators.

Public health administration is becoming an increasingly popular area of study as public health officials are faced with the formidable task of reforming health care in the United States to reduce costs and increase accessibility while still ensuring that the public receives the best and most cost-effective health care services. Public health administrators also work to identify the complex array of health issues facing the public, translate these issues into an actionable agenda, and help the public understand the initiatives that will be taken to improve the public’s health.

Public health administrators play a critical role in safeguarding the safety of health care services provided to the public. Their goal is to provide leadership and expertise in the delivery of public health services. They do this by recognizing that health care is a vital resource for society and must be safe, effective, efficient, timely, equitable, and client-centered.

3. Key Challenges in Public Health Administration

Staffing is a major concern. Nothing happens without steady, competent, and trained staff. Staff members must be maintained in order to keep their knowledge as productive as possible without harming the patient and their relationship with the administrative staff. It is critical to the success and performance of an organization. Staff turnover is inevitable in today’s working environment. Administrators expect certain levels of turnover in their staff. When turnover becomes excessive, it can cost the organization a great deal of money and time, which ultimately affects how the organization is able to meet its mission. High turnover can also affect the remaining staff on a psychological level. An overworked employee will exhibit signs of stress, fatigue, anger, and disillusionment. This can be contagious, and the organization can lose more than one employee. When an employee leaves the organization, it can often lead to an administrative turnover as well. This causes a loss of leadership and direction that is also not conducive to an organization meeting its mission. High turnover rates among healthcare staff can affect the delivery of services and patient care. Staff shortages and turnover can affect the quality of care given to patients, which can in turn affect the health status of a given community. High turnover and shortages can change the “culture” of an organization and can be very costly to the overall productivity of the organization.

4. Strategies for Effective Public Health Administration

Utilization of intricate allocation source advancement is imperative for governments to develop very modern methods of distribution approaches for the regional distribution of foundation resources, such as various types of grants and manoeuvre budget planning. Omitted limit regulation to prevent misuse is the necessary function to control resource allocation, accompanied by the development of allocation methods making use of economic levers to right the issues of market failure in public goods and to achieve an optimal distribution of resources. Across all the resources in the economy, health is the foremost issue to be addressed, and for this reason, the health sector is recommended to be given special priority in the allocation of resources, and we must ensure its good health. Simulation of the best and worst-case scenarios of the resources required to achieve certain health outcomes can also be a beneficial tool for policymakers in resource allocation decision making. This method will essentially aid the government in establishing a benchmark of the level of resources, which would signal the right time to release the more expensive second-best policy measures to achieve a desired health outcome for a certain marginal change in the resources employed. In particular, the real-time simulation of policy issues in communicable disease would be useful.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, it is important for a nation to have public health administration. Such administration is necessary to ensure the coordination and continuity of a plan. It is also necessary to have a point person or a group of people that directly speak for and manage the effort. Public health administration is crucial to the successful implementation of public health initiatives as its level of organization, planning, and management directly impact the end result. It makes sense for administration to be grounded in reality. If a public health administrative task is so far ahead of its time, the project as a whole may fail. With administrative support, the reorganization of existing patterns into a new and more efficient level can be conducted with reduced risk to the public. Public health administration is also required to make sure that healthcare costs are controlled. In the U.S., healthcare costs directly take a large chunk out of virtually every state, local, or federal agency budget. A failure to control healthcare costs may result in the loss of funding for certain initiatives as well as a reduced scope or quality. This can also apply on a global level. Public health administration is all the more important for the global health initiatives being run by agencies such as the WHO, as the resources are often not available to match the healthcare needs and problems have a large potential to disrupt economies and societies. Finally, public health administration is important in times of health crises. SARS, the 2009 H1N1 influenza, and 9/11 are all examples of crisis points where the U.S has had to implement a public health intervention or policy right away. At these instances, the issue at hand is often health protection in that the situation is urgent and may be a high risk to public safety. Measures taken come in the form of administrative decisions such as an executive order and may span a wide array of areas from information dissemination and public awareness to immunization or law enforcement activities with health mandates. The state of public health administration may be in a state of crisis. In the U.S., the field of public health has recently become something of a lost child, with a decline in funding and an uncertain future. The use of public health administration has not been optimally realized, and the administrative infrastructure has become weakened, resulting in a less than optimal effort. In regards to the historical stream of public health administration, attempts to fix the issue with administrative restructuring have often been shortsighted and in some cases, detrimental. A common fatal flaw is the failure to realize that public health administration is an investment in the future. As seen in the education of health administration professionals, the reaping of the benefits may not come until a much later time. Thus, a hasty practice of instituting administration for the mere meet of today’s needs has led to the dismantling of valuable administrative resources and a lost opportunity to effect lasting change. At present, the U.S can ill afford to lose any ground on the management and administration of its public health efforts, and steps should be taken to reinforce and bolster the field of public health administration.