pay for homework answers

pay for homework answers

Paying for Homework Answers: A Wise Investment or Academic Dishonesty?

1. Introduction

In the wake of this, many education pundits have cited that instituting a ban on these services would be a plausible course of action to take. But would this type of action actually be beneficial and if so, how would it be achieved? This would become a topic of hot debate among the ill-defined policies of the federal government and the various states regarding education. To enforce a ban, there would need to be active participation from educators and parents to make the offspring aware that doing homework is essential no matter how trivial an assignment may seem. And there would need to be a change in culture from one that values the grade of an assignment to one that values the knowledge gained from said assignment. Ultimately though, it becomes a matter of success rate on such a policy. With education budget cuts in the US and the large number of states strapped for cash with the struggling economy, the chance of a policy on homework being effectively enforced is slim.

In recent years, the online assignment business has boomed in such a way that companies vary their product and service to an extent where a student can buy an essay, a paper, or even a whole thesis at prices that can range anywhere from $20 – $60 per page. Compared to other services online such as that of a mechanic service or a plumber, doing homework is not essential to the average student. However, given the pressure that comes with an academic career, this has become a common occurrence for college and high school students alike to come in contact with an essay or paper that can be considered tantamount to that of contracting a high school student to fix a problem with a car.

2. Pros of Paying for Homework Answers

When it comes to courses that require the use of math and science, there is a higher need for students to understand and to be shown work for a particular concept. In these cases, it is extremely beneficial for a student to provide the answer provided is a full understanding on how to solve the problem, being in the form of an equation or of a written theory. In subjects where it is not important to understand, the which of the two is the case. An excellent example of the latter is a student learning a second language taking a Spanish course as a required course as opposed to a native speaker taking the course for an easy A to boost his or her grade point average. The earlier student would really benefit from understanding and storing the knowledge on how to speak and understand Spanish sentences, whereas the latter would not.

Paying for homework help is not considered a taboo anymore. However, there are different reasons for it. While some students may want an assignment to be done so that they can learn from it to achieve a higher grade, others may simply want to escape doing the assignment to ensure they pass their course. These students would answer “yes” to the question “Did I really learn anything?”, but they may not want to invest the time needed to learn should a particular assignment strongly hinder their future objectives.

3. Cons of Paying for Homework Answers

An indirect consequence of paying for homework help is that the students will be missing out on the benefits of feedback which adapts to specific student learning needs. Ideally, feedback should be linked to specific learning goals with suggestion for future action. Homework is an active tool in feedback process. The student’s task is to engage with the feedback, perhaps requiring forward planning for an assignment to be completed to a certain timetable. Feedback might result in further learning, with completion of a further task. The outcome of feedback should also inform the teacher whether an assignment was a success and contribute to teacher’s planning. This is the cycle of assessment. If a student does not do an assignment themselves, it is impossible for them to learn from it and thus they will not benefit from the assignment or perhaps identify the feedback as relevant.

According to helpguide.org, the student will be getting into “Escape and Avoidance Learning” habit where they will avoid doing the assignments altogether; they will avoid practicing so they’ll never have to experience the “bad” feeling of making errors. Because for some students, especially those who have trouble with focus, whether it’s staying on task or concentrating, homework can be very stressful, they will enjoy the “escape” of avoiding assignments and the relief they feel by just getting it turned in, regardless of the quality. They will miss the feedback as a chance to improve. Students like this will never think about doing an assignment for the sake of learning something; rather they define a successful assignment as one that is completed, no matter the quality. This unhealthy meditation of the assignment process will affect these students when exam time comes and the unpracticed material surfaces. They will be more likely to make the same mistakes. This usually results in poor grades and may cause students to feel more stress and even anxiety about their schoolwork.

Paying for the homework can cause the students to fall into the trap where they depend on these services on doing their own assignments.

P. Lowers Grade

4. Ethical Considerations

In essence, the company believes that the problems of the traditionally high cost of academic assistance, as well as the stress and a perceived lack of self-esteem students experience, can all be solved with the use of a well-designed website. Their sense of “self-help” in these areas can be implemented with the provision of in-depth solutions to avoid wasted time and resources, as well as the opportunity to attain top marks with minimum effort. The site offers these benefits as strong justifications for the necessity of academic assistance. Deciding how far one should go to achieve these benefits is a matter of personal opinion. The company’s affordable service, in turn, raises questions of social justice; namely, is access to academic assistance a right of all students? If those who cannot use this service are inevitably disadvantaged in terms of securing the best jobs. This site provides an equal opportunity for success to all students.

The website claims that many students are capable of paying for academic solutions. Students will pay to work with a tutor, many of whom are current or former teachers, or graduate students or other academic “experts” who provide a similar form of knowledge dissemination to the individualized educational service received from the website. In addition, faced with increasingly tight job markets and other academic pressures, the amount of student anxiety has escalated dramatically. Many experts believe this anxiety, and the general lack of self-esteem, has contributed to a weakened commitment to academic integrity. It is also a possibility that these students merely have a different threshold for what they consider acceptable academic performance.

5. Conclusion

The research suggests that one of the more promising approaches to crowd anger management may be changing the identity and nature of events in order to minimise high identification behaviours. Measures to reduce identification and perceived stake in contests could ultimately reduce the risk of disappointment and anger in losing fans being projected onto players or officials. Similarly, where avoidance of sensitive topics and decisions related to honour and pride are not possible, consideration can be given to having these events in more controlled and private settings to reduce the risk of large scale audience participation. These measures could ultimately reduce the probability of triggers to crowd anger in various event settings however it is important to consider that prevention is difficult and at times, inevitably crowd anger episodes can be expected. In these cases, findings from Displaced Aggression theory and Social Identity Model of Deindividuation may be useful in understanding the processes of crowd anger and utilising this knowledge to predict the potential sites and times at which crowd anger is most likely to be expressed. This information can assist in taking appropriate action to limit damage or violence during crowd anger episodes and aid speedy resolution and damage control.

This essay has discussed the causes of audience rage and its negative influence on law and order in society. It is clear that there are a variety of reasons why audiences become enraged at public events and these can include factors related to intense identification with teams or individuals, mob mentality, and perceived unfair judging. These tendencies can ultimately result in disorder and even damage to property and in some cases, escalate to physical violence. Research suggests that despite prevention efforts there is still potential for crowd anger to escalate to irrational and aggressive behaviour in various contexts. Therefore, some of the explanations and theories raised in this essay can provide useful insight into the dynamics and precursors of crowd anger and assist in further understanding how these events unfold, and most importantly, how they can be prevented from spiralling out of control. First and foremost, it is important to be realistic about prevention efforts and it should be accepted that crowd anger will always be a possibility in relevant public contexts and effective prevention will only mitigate the risk of it escalating. It would also be unfeasible to attempt to eliminate all of the possible triggers of crowd anger in public events so organisational management should be primarily concerned with minimising these possibilities during event or contest preparation.