is proofreading services legit

is proofreading services legit

The Legitimacy of Proofreading Services

1. Introduction

However, the use of proofreading services remains very controversial, as some researchers believe that they involve a high risk of interference with the author’s messages and hence, impair the quality of the final work. Other scholars seem to agree with this position, because they suspect that the advent of proofreading services means that students resort to professional support more than in the past, and would like to associate this increase to a decrease in the quality of the students’ texts, which would justify segregation of the services. However, a literature review on proofreading services in papers about thesis writing yields less than three articles, while Banarjee and Allan (2010, p. 144) claim that proofreading represents the main result of receiving external assistance. It is worth mentioning that well-organized language revision services include careful reading, correction and the assurance that the text quality is adequate for its purposes.

A teacher has recently shared her concern with me regarding the increasing growth of professional proofreading services. She complained about the lack of information on how professional proofreaders work with students and how prevalent the use of these services would be among her own students. A research on these services in higher education reveals that they are a point of much controversy among academicians, similar to what happens with the ghostwriters in the field of professional ethics, although proofreading services do not raise any concerns related to intellectual dishonesty. Ericsson et al. (2011, p. 74) refer to ghostwriters as those professionals who do not, in reality, participate in the “genius creation” (a work from nothing), which has led to an ethical controversy, especially in the fields of medicine and law.

2. Benefits of Proofreading Services

A student who has research to finish suffers a significant hardship when he uses more money for privacy in obtaining proofreading services. When conducting research, it’s important that a student draws on skills or knowledge learned from university or that will benefit the student personally. When one is hired to work for a particular position that demands high-level expertise, one is not expected to consult other individuals outside the position to solve difficult tasks. The same case applies when a student conducts research. The right thing to do is to utilize the skills taught while in school in order to achieve goals that are defined by the work at hand. If a student outsources proofreading services to correct simple grammatical errors by employing an agency, then that student has failed to develop skills demanded by his or her course to enhance personal academic growth. In broader terms, when that student goes out of the educational system and fails to get the required training, then institutions have not equipped the learners with the needed skills. Schools are not only educational institutions but also training institutions. A student who is given a grade at the end of the year is proof that the student has managed to accomplish the responsibilities set out by that institution as per the year. The individual is then able to utilize their developed skills in their subsequent careers.

Proofreading services, or as they are often called, copy-editing and proofreading services, are an essential tool for writers in all fields. Proofreading services help transform a struggling writer into an accomplished one. There are several benefits associated with proofreading services, such as enhancing one’s personal education experience, helping one get high grades, ensuring the content is structured properly, and lastly, proofreading services can also make one a better writer. Most people have benefited from proofreading services at least a few times in their lives. More often than not, one has benefited from proofreading services even if someone else did the proofreading work on one’s behalf. For instance, when someone else proofreads a report for a student, chances are high that the person proofreading the report is providing the proofreading services willingly and out of the goodness of their heart. Some of the individuals who offer proofreading services get compensated for doing it. It is not yet clear whether this is permissible or correct practice in schools. This has led to a complicated issue that requires the scrutiny of citizens, scholars, and educators. It could be possible that while some forms of monetary compensation offered to proofreaders are morally blameless because they support good work, the acceptance of money for editing is tantamount to academic dishonesty because it undermines the design of the whole academic process. There are, therefore, good reasons to be concerned about the increasing trend in paying for proofreading services.

3. Common Concerns about Proofreading Services

– By getting proofreading help, would not my writing sound different from my normal writing so that my teacher can realize it? In my opinion, this is one of the most irrational concerns. However, a large amount of students fairly express this concern. The intention here is to sound like the student’s typical use of language, to write the ideas completely in the words of the student, and to ensure that the student’s disclosure would be as full as possible, but definitely not inadequate. Assuming that the proofreader always transfers the academic language to the student’s writing, there certainly remain enough chances of suitability.

– Is it cheating? This is the most common question, often indicatively or suspiciously expressed. It is a very serious and major concern. The bias that any received help is cheating is incredibly dominant in educational environments, especially in some geographic regions or those heavily affected by some cultural influences or education systems. The determination problem can be detected among especially the ones who have been advised not to take such help from their teachers or education administrators. Even though individual efforts and achievement should be rightfully valued and prioritized, eliminating or demonizing all kinds of help is definitely not a wise choice.

Before deciding to buy proofreading services, most users have some doubts about their legitimacy. From my experience, most objections are related to ethical and systemic issues. Deciding to buy proofreading services from professional educators could be uncomfortable if the buyer is not familiar with the field of education. It might be even more complicated if the buyer is a student who has been previously advised not to get any proofreading or editing help. The main concerns expressed by the buyers can be listed as follows:

4. How to Identify Legitimate Proofreading Services

Finally, how a company promotes itself may reveal whether it is reputable. Big promises, such as “Guaranteed to Raise Your Grade,” should be dismissed. This promise is based on the assumption that good grammar equals a good grade when many other things go into the grading of a dissertation. Also, look for services that promote a preventative approach through instruction (such as information about how to avoid plagiarism and do original work) or information on how to conduct research. Because a dissertation is so important, self-promotion that claims it is the only way to reach the finish line is not a reliable indicator of its legitimacy.

The best way to ascertain the legitimacy of dissertation proofreading services is to ask the services for references from previous customers. Most services should happily provide this information because they stand by their work. If they are reluctant to provide references or they seem too perfect (all five-star reviews, etc.), this could be a red flag. Price is also a good indicator of the integrity of a service. While it is certainly acceptable to charge a fair market rate, be wary of prices that are overly low or high. Prices that are significantly lower than those charged by competitors could signal bad quality or even a scam. The service may send rushed returns with lots of errors or may use non-native English speakers to proofread students’ work. Over-the-top prices, on the other hand, could signal that the service is gouging customers by charging excessively for routine services. A fair price will be charged that reflects the time and experience it takes to proofread dissertations or other works.

5. Conclusion

We shall give, as was proposed before, that the division of the data points in VTE and IN VTE seems to mirror the patterns that were clustered under the legal and illegal phrases, respectively, although nothing can be advanced further on other domains. We persevere in the proposition that in order to fully understand these differences, the analyses of the data under all relevant sub-corpora should be implemented at various levels of linguistic and discourse structures. Insofar as these cross-disciplinary efforts continue to burgeon, it will not be surprising to see new questions being formulated and a new breed of interdisciplinary investigators to step up to wrestle with them.

This paper has sought to explore the increasingly important yet relatively overlooked macrostructural features of introductory and concluding chapters in the fields of biology, business, epidemiology, and sociology. The results of this study are compared to related work by other authors and to our original hypothesis, and they are used in discussing potential strategies for improved writing pedagogy. Similar to previous studies, our results also further corroborate the idea that two-component papers that are commonly found in the introduction of biology stand out from the rest of the disciplines: 9 articles out of 19. Regarding the interpretations, it should be emphasized that the present data and analyses mainly provide evidence for identifying the features of biological writing at macro-organizational scales. We argue that the observed differences in the genres of the disciplines at scales ranging from words to large clusters of word sequences emerge from the same process of developmental selection operating at all levels of linguistic structure as well as genre-level variables. The evidence presented in the current study must therefore be considered as being part of the much larger trajectory of cross-disciplinary investigations required to understand the full nature of such domain-general and domain-specific factors in writing.