is chegg plagiarism checker accurate

is chegg plagiarism checker accurate

The Accuracy of Chegg Plagiarism Checker

1. Introduction

The most disturbing issues in academia today include addressing whether or not the next generation of professionals will be properly prepared for the requirements of higher-order thinking. As technology becomes more prevalent in society with each passing day, it is no longer a question of whether a certain type of technology will find its way into the classroom, but to what extent this technology will be used. Will various forms of technology hinder or help the educational process? The notion that technology will hinder the learning process is a misconception, for this argument is comparative to stating that books on a library shelf prevent students from learning. By utilizing technological mediums in a proper fashion, future professionals might find themselves better equipped to teach a wider variety of students. In the simplest sense, technology can provide individuals with an alternative method of learning that better suits their unique learning style. Imagine a classroom where a student is overburdened by the grammatical rules of a foreign language. In order to promote comprehension, the student might copy and paste a segment of text into a free online translator in order to pinpoint the exact meaning of the passage. While this student’s teacher may consider this form of language to be cheating, the student has in fact accessed a useful tool in order to understand a foreign language while also improving his basic writing skills. With the use of technology in education, an instructor must be able to distinguish between cheating and a more efficient method of problem solving. An analogy can be drawn in the investigation of plagiarism in the technological age and the efficiency of various plagiarism detection services with the least invasive intervention.

2. How Chegg Plagiarism Checker Works

Chegg employs a team of undergraduate students to moderate the Chegg website and look for any inaccuracies. This team, known as the “reliable answering team,” works on numerous school textbooks to verify that a question has been answered correctly. Completion times can vary for this team depending on the difficulty of the question and the response provided. Primarily, the reliable answering team looks for questions that have not already been answered correctly, stating “There are a few of us who focus on reanswering questions cuz they were either incomplete or just plain wrong.” Prices can range for this job, from 20 cents a question to 40 cents when the team is in high demand. This is good news to students, as textbooks that are currently being taught at a college are top priority to this team. By getting questions verified in Chegg, there is a chance that a student can get their question answered correctly within days of posting it.

The accuracy of Chegg homework solutions has been a growing concern to students of colleges and universities. Students might feel that a correct textbook answer is hard to come by, aside from getting the answers from their own professor. Teachers may feel that the accuracy of Chegg solutions hurts the learning process by giving students an easy way to find textbook answers without truly understanding the material. Teachers and students contemplating the accuracy of Chegg might wonder whether there is any way to filter out inaccurate solutions and find correct answers to student posted questions.

Chegg has been a significant improvement for online education, offering students a cure to skewed learning and exorbitantly high textbook prices. Despite it not having the full textbook solutions available for every single textbook, the Chegg website provides enough solutions to help college students understand the material and study for exams. Some college students may wonder how accurate those textbook answers are on Chegg, so during online office hours, we decided to ask a DeVry professor how he felt about the textbook answers on Chegg. He felt that about 80% of the book answers are correct, and that any answer that is incorrect can be revised by the student who asked the question. This is a good deal of accuracy for an online source, but students would feel more at ease when using Chegg if they knew that their textbook answers were 100% accurate.

3. Evaluating the Accuracy of Chegg Plagiarism Checker

Article two delivers some upsetting information regarding Turnitin. Many students see Turnitin as an efficient tool for submitting assignment drafts to check for any missed citations or accidental plagiarism. It is learned that plagiarism checks with Turnitin are allowed through API by certain educational institutions. This includes full access to submitted work; past, present, and future works from a particular institution. At private institutions, an agreement between the institution and Turnitin is discussed, the most severe agreement is known as the service level option. This agreement allows for submitted material to become the property of Turnitin and is subject to any use or disclosure deemed necessary. A lawsuit regarding this agreement occurred in 2007. A 19-year-old student found a breach of contract and good faith when Turnitin used and distributed copies of his rough draft essay without his consent. This case was dismissed as the student failed to identify damages or harm done upon the distribution of his work. This article shows that the service level agreement is no joke and Turnitin may obtain rights to your work without you knowing.

Albeit seemingly effective, the first article does a good job of highlighting the various flaws present in the modern-day plagiarism software. The article states that free software relies on IT application to monitor the web for possible copycats of the document in question. The article suggests that well-known search engines only search about 0.2% of the existence of the published web, thus allowing for an abyss of unseen material to surface. The article then leads to the paraphrasing ability of several updating software. It states that modern rewording software has a very disappointing plagiarism software with results often showcasing not enough or too much similarity between sources. It says that this makes the software useless for detection but is very likely to improve in time.

4. Limitations and Potential Issues

This literature shows us that even the PLA software has both advantages and disadvantages in preventing plagiarism. In the hands of the Chegg Plagiarism Checker service, the software tool can be accessed easily and quickly to produce a quite accurate result in detecting plagiarism. However, on the other hand, the use of PLA software is still limited to detecting only copy-paste with content available on the Internet, even serving as a tool to determine whether a text is a plagiarism is inadequate because it cannot show a comparison of text between the original source and the result of the detected plagiarism. This is feared to make it as an excuse for someone who gets a verdict on his writing that is considered as a plagiarism, with Chegg Plagiarism Checker resulted only 15-20% of the detected plagiarism is really deliberate, and most of the remaining are indeed caused by oversight in providing references or accidental similarity of contents. In addition, with the ease of detection given the Chegg service, will make the writer feel less challenged to conduct self-examination of the writing to avoid the plagiarism, since the end result can be easily done by checking it with PLA software. This will cause loss of analytical function PLA software itself as a means of preventive over the act of plagiarism.

5. Conclusion

From all the evidence we gathered in this experiment, it seems to us that the Chegg plagiarism checker has high accuracy. However, we do realize that it is not perfect, and there are definitely ways in which it could be improved to increase the accuracy of its detections. One such way that it could be improved could be by checking against a wider range of sources including subscription sites. An alternative would be to carry out limited checks against Internet search engines and compare the leads with extremely reliable modeling of web data using a focused web crawler. This would enable content from sites which require payment for access to be checked more fully. One other method which would help improve the accuracy would be through the use of machine learning. This powerful method of analysis has the potential to uncover much more extensive duplication by grouping items which have been copied or by identifying near duplicates. These methods are far from straightforward and would involve significant investment of time and effort. With the increasing presence of students submit assignments electronically there is an ever growing requirement for accurate plagiarism detection. Hopefully the Chegg service and similar services from other companies will continue to evolve and improve to meet this requirement.