ihuman case study answers

ihuman case study answers

The Importance of iHuman Case Study Answers

1. Understanding iHuman Case Studies

The most effective way of understanding the importance of case studies is comparing them to how medical students learn in a clinical environment. It is said that case studies are the equivalent of seeing a patient with the guidance of a specialty doctor doing a well-supervised history and examination. The differential diagnosis process is akin to thinking about the signs and symptoms and coming back to link theory to practice. This is the essence of what medical students go through to understand what is normal and abnormal about a human, the core of medical education.

There are two case types. Tutorial cases provide detailed feedback on the student’s work at each step. Assessment cases are only scored right or wrong and offer the student significantly less feedback. At times, it can be difficult to understand whether you are engaging with an iHuman case study. In Autumn 2016, the software on the iHuman platform was updated, making it much more modern and visually appealing. However, the case studies lost the feel of being within the iHuman environment.

Case studies are examples that are employed to illustrate hypotheses for the real world. iHuman case studies are specifically designed and curated to increase problem-solving and decision-making abilities utilizing in-depth founded medical information. These case studies are extremely detailed. They can range from a few paragraphs to a few pages long. A narrative generally unfolds as you engage with each case, which is very different from many other learning resources. Most information is presented all at once and is not buried within a story. This adds a layer of complexity to the learning process as you must use the information provided to analyze the signs and symptoms and the medical history before reaching a solution.

2. Benefits of Providing Accurate Case Study Answers

The necessity of getting accurate answers in case studies is of paramount importance. The fact that case studies are based on real-life scenarios, whether it is scientific, social, economical, etc., there have to be certain solutions or answers to the problems mentioned or the events that have taken place. The case study method enables in-depth, multi-faceted explorations of complex issues in their real-life settings. The value of the case study approach is well recognized in the fields of business, law, and policy, but somewhat less so in health services research. Based on our experiences of conducting several case studies, we reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing this method. Providing accurate case study answers can enable us to generalize findings and see if predictions hold true. With the ability to break down facts and events in a case study to simple cause and effect, it can be easier to show something to be true on the present day and apply those findings back to say, for example, a pharmaceutical industry 10 years down the line. By accurate answers, qualitative and quantitative data can also be formulated more easily. This can enable better understanding of major events in a particular case and later translate to more understandable teaching tools for students. As our aim is to reach educators and provide ways to teach on biomedical research, having accurate answers will enable us to build on i-Human’s current case studies and develop tools that can get students to better assess situations and serve to provide better understanding of clinical reasoning. With i-Human currently a clinical learning tool, our case studies can later be translated to an actual clinical setting to assess if and how certain results or medications could impact patients. Through these specific data on data analyses, comparative method, and stepping sequential analysis are enable us to gain better answers and case study tools can be constantly reassessed to get better answers and improved results. These can be utilized to do continuous case revisits to assess patient progress in specific cases. All in all, it serves to provide a more solid base on building and knowledge i-Human learnings for students and also to provide better understandings and teaching methods for educators.

3. Strategies for Developing Effective iHuman Case Study Answers

Keep in mind these possible strategies to make sure that you are addressing the right issues and answering the questions as best as you can: – Use the SMART Mnemonic to make sure your case study answers are specific enough. – Be more analytic about the case and try to identify the cause and effects of the problem being presented in the case. – Identify and differentiate the signs and symptoms mentioned in the case, and then group them by priority. – Reflect on past clinical experiences and try to relate the iHuman case to similar situations you’ve encountered. This will help evoke clinical reasoning and you can also critique the actions you’ve done to resolve similar situations.

iHuman case studies require a lot of analytic and critical thinking. It is very important to read each question completely and to be able to identify what is being asked. When you are presented with the background information, make sure to read through it at least once, and then you can use the points below as a guide as to what information you need to identify.

Developing effective iHuman case study answers can be a difficult and challenging task. The following are some recommended strategies for developing effective iHuman case study answers.

4. Common Mistakes to Avoid in iHuman Case Study Answers

Unclear and broad questions can lead to ambiguity in the information provided by the simulated patient. Always ask yourself, “Is what I am asking directly related to the patient’s condition?” Composure is very important. Especially if you are a student with little clinical experience, it can be daunting speaking to a virtual patient. This may lead to some people rushing through the case, wanting to quickly get to a diagnosis and treatment plan. All information gathered should be documented in the history, with no assumptions made about the diagnosis early in the case.

The first area of consideration is the accuracy of the case. It can be very easy to make assumptions concerning the patient’s condition without backing your thoughts up with evidence. Just remember that the iHuman case studies are based on real patients and events. You will often need to refer back to your professional medical knowledge to know what questions to ask in order to uncover the information you need.

There are several common mistakes that can be made in iHuman case study answers which can deter you from achieving a perfect score. The following section will identify and explore some of the more frequently made errors, giving you a better understanding of what to avoid.

5. Conclusion: Enhancing Learning Through iHuman Case Studies

In conclusion, iHuman Case Studies have been a valuable resource for both my students and myself. The cases have helped develop higher level thinking and reasoning skills. The patient presented with multiple symptoms, which allowed the students to differentiate between the signs and symptoms to provide an accurate diagnosis. At times the correct diagnosis was not reached, so the students needed to reflect on the reasoning process to identify where it went wrong. In tournament style cases, it was interesting to introduce an element of competition and see the students engage with the case over the week with the aim of reaching a correct diagnosis. Many students recognized the format as being similar to popular video games with the concept of reaching a final level with a correct diagnosis. The relevance to practice is an important factor for our students and the cases were able to simulate the practice environment to a high degree. The students have developed an understanding of decision making and have been able to apply clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills to practice justify all management decisions. The feedback from students has been very positive and many have indicated a preference to iHuman cases being the preferred learning resource.