how to write article review

how to write article review

How to Write an Effective Article Review

1. Introduction

To understand the article review writing process, you must first understand what an article review is. An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience. When writing an article review, you will summarize the main ideas, arguments, positions, and findings, and then critique the article’s contributions to the field and overall effectiveness. A good review is both balanced and fair. It analyzes importance to understanding of the field’s background, the author’s aims and whether or not they achieved those aims, and it includes a discussion of your own viewpoint of the article’s concepts. After understanding what an article review consists of, it is important to know how to write it. This can be broken down into four sections, the first providing guidelines on how to understand what the article is talking about. Step two is reading the article while making notes on the main concepts. Third will be to assess the article making points on the author’s success in expressing his or her ideas. The final step is to critique the article assessing its success toward the aims. With these steps in mind, it will be much easier to write the review when the time comes.

2. Understanding the Purpose of an Article Review

An article review gives scholars or students a chance to actually study the work of an expert on a given topic. There are many reasons for doing this: – When a scholar or a student writes an article review, he or she gets to demonstrate the understanding of a particular article. – By writing an article review, the scholar or student has a closer understanding of the research methodology used, and of the data interpretation and analysis. – Article reviews offer a great deal of value to members of the public who are trying to stay current in their given field, or who want to read and understand an article without having to take a course and study the article in the same detail as a student. – Review articles of good quality are frequently needed in the health professions, for example to keep health professionals up to date with the body of evidence or to make best practice recommendations which have a foundation in evidence.

3. Steps to Writing an Article Review

1. Begin by thoroughly reading and understanding the article. Keep a journal. Make a note of key points and arguments of the article as well as your own ideas and reactions. 2. Assume that the reader of your review has not read the article and address the review as a description of the article you are reviewing. This is the most crucial step for it really dictates what the main body of your review will consist of. This is because without any known evidence of what has been the content of the article there cannot be an analysis of the validity of the article’s content. At this stage, it is also important to take note of any key statements provided in the article or any basic assumptions that appear to underlie the article. More information will be given on this level of understanding in the next topic, Analysis of an article. 3. Re-read the article. Try to avoid any sort of plagiarism and make sure that you do not simply interpret the article as it is in the author’s words. When explaining the article, you must understand it from your point of view. Your interpretations must be an analysis of the article. What has been understood from it and how can it be linked to other things. Duplicate all information that is relevant to the article in italics. This will distinguish the author’s words from yours. With this approach, the entire review should consist of little that is directly from the article. Any information that is must be given reference.

4. Tips for Crafting a Persuasive Article Review

An article review is a kind of assignment that entails a detailed and in-depth assessment of an article. This is no simple task. It is dependent on your persuasion to enable the reader to agree or disagree with the article in question. If your essay is to be successful, you must be able to convince the reader to accept your evaluation. The level of persuasion required can be used by mixing in an opinion with the critical evaluation. Alter the type of voice in opinion and criticism. This will achieve a smooth transition between the two and add to the overall persuasiveness of the article. Try using some direct and indirect quotations from the article. This will show that you have a strong understanding of the article and its main points. It also adds to the credibility of your evaluation.

Tip 1: Use a persuasive tone in your response.

Do you have an article review due and think it will be simple? Perhaps you should have a closer look at its title. A tool for understanding how to analyze and comprehend an article or text. It is much more difficult to determine whether the article is good. If the audience is confused, now is the time to make a decision to learn how to sign on the best Article Review.

5. Conclusion

Thus, even though the author has made no reference to male writers as such, the women’s language and the associated men’s language is brought in to provide a theoretical explanation of the need for the significant increase in the number of women taking first degrees in the early 1980s. As Lakoff (1975) believed that the reason Women’s Liber had begun was the consistency in grammar and in the sexual meaning of vocabulary items, in revealing their plight in the underachievement of women, to be consonant with the student’s personal experience regarding their linguistic performance. Lakoff noted that in order to change the reality, it was necessary to change the language. This can be seen to mirror what male stream sociolinguistics was trying to do at the time; to get a better understanding of linguistic behaviour in all women and to suggest change, in language or otherwise, that would involve a raise in the social status of women. Lakoff believed that the best way of bringing about relevant changes in the position of women was via the creation of government policies, which could now be tested out using methods provided by male stream sociolinguistics. It might have been more interesting to have L+C carry out some of these studies in collaboration with women, rather than using them merely as subjects. An interaction between male and female sociolinguists, using most of the methods mentioned by L+C could provide a very productive means to further changes in the position of women, worldwide. An analysis of such interaction would undoubtedly result in more data on changes in women’s language, which by now could be viewed as a separate entity to men’s language. This is an area, which during the 1970s was believed to be due to lack of data, which was made redundant by the work of L+C.