how to do an article review

how to do an article review

How to Write an Effective Article Review

1. Introduction

This analysis of the article is very significant, and it is achieved normally in the assigned word limit. Mention the purpose of the article and how it is achieved. Indicate whether the information is apt for arriving at solutions to the problem. Label the conclusions or results of the article. Then the critic has to check the credibility of the conclusions/results. Finally, assess the presentation of the article. This includes the sequence of the article, its logic or coherence, and simplicity of understanding.

An article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess someone else’s article. The goal of the preparatory getting ready of a review is to appreciate the article. This involves your reactions to the article. If writing for a general populace, you would express what particularly interested you in the article. More usually, you would consider the article within the context of other literature on the topic. Your review must be specific and short.

Today, when we talk about writing an article review, we are basically talking about simplifying the method of writing an article review. The same method applies to writing an article or, in the same way, you can say a summarization for yourself. Students who are studying always use this method to get the idea of the topic they are trying to get the deep on.

2. Understanding the Purpose of an Article Review

A review is also an article, so it must have a clear internal logic, which generally means that it is not useful to present an example of a faulty logic an article that is too convoluted or nebulous to be easily followed. The review may be more about the logic of the research, in which case it is necessary to explain where the article review paper is coming from.

The review is evaluated on the standards or criteria that the reviewer believes are most important in understanding the intent of the article. An article reporting on research would contend that the most important criteria would be whether the article successfully conveys the research to the reader. Some research is evaluated on the likelihood of it being tested by the reader (emanation) and effectiveness is established by verity of findings being tested.

Clearly, the writer of the review requires an understanding of the intent of the article, and a brief background within the topic may be helpful. This is not dissimilar to the reading phase of an SQ3R where one attempts to identify the author’s main goal (the “Q” in SQ3R is for Question). An article to be reviewed will generally be an article reporting on a research study. It is quite helpful for the reviewer to also read the original study so as to compare the information given in the article with the information in the original study. This can help the reviewer to find “unsound” information in the article.

Rationale: The text of an article review writing involves a straightforward summary of a piece of writing supported by a few examples and commentary. In most cases, article reviews are prepared about articles appearing in a newspaper or magazine, which give the writer ample opportunity to simply present information within a fairly narrow, structured framework. The author is required to give an informed, knowledgeable, and relevant response to the piece.

3. Key Steps in Writing an Article Review

After that, the student has to understand the meaning of paraphrase and summary. This is essential in article review writing and also writing summary reports on research articles. The student can take the notes while reading the article as a guide, re-writing the article contents in their own words. This is also important so that there is no accidental plagiarism in the article review.

Next, is to have pen and paper ready when reading the article. The student should take notes while reading the article for the first time. The notes should be on the general impressions that the article has on the student, anything about the article that seems confusing, and jargon words that are hard to understand.

Now, the first step is to read the article. This is self-explanatory, but it is important that the student reads the article more than once. The first reading should be to understand the article as a whole, and for the second time, the student should read the article more critically.

There are numerous pieces of advice on how to write an article review, but only a few advise on what not to do in writing a review. This is important because by knowing what not to do, it can provide a clearer understanding to the student on the dos in writing the review. The steps given can also be used as a guideline for any article review before it is being published to the public.

4. Tips for Writing a Persuasive and Well-Structured Article Review

1. Understand what article review is: An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience. When writing an article review, you will summarize the main ideas, arguments, positions, and findings, and then critique the article’s contributions to the field and overall effectiveness. 2. Begin by reading the article multiple times to ensure a true understanding of the work. Once you fully understand it, you can begin your critiques and determining your evidence for your critiques. Next, you should identify what the author’s goals were and whether or not he or she achieved them. This is important because it will provide the reader with an understanding of the article and some concise background information to base their opinions on whether you judged the article effectively. 3. Next, you will want to create a strong thesis and align your article review. This is important for later when you begin to judge the article. By creating a thesis, we are able to identify whether the review is going to be a positive, negative, or mixed evaluation of the article. Now you must decide what your evidence will be. Your evidence should be specific details from the article and should consist of more than half your review. This is where many article reviews fail as they rely too heavily on summary. By using specific evidence, you can provide answers to the following questions: who, what, where, when, and how? 4. Now that you’re prepared, it is time to write your article review. Stick as close as possible to the article to ensure you are providing the evidence needed to answer the above-mentioned questions. You should only use the author’s words or use his or her specific ideas and always remember to keep a partial nature to avoid bias. Once a paragraph has been written (using the author’s idea), follow it with a citing the evidence in parentheses. Continue this pattern throughout the rest of the review.

5. Conclusion

In the conclusion, the author restates the importance of article reviews through recommending the article and emphasizing the significance that article reviews have for its readers. The author’s final recommendation is that article reviews are necessary for understanding a piece of literature and that it is in the best interest of both the writer and the reader to write a review. To end the article, the author defines the article’s authority through suggestions and opinions given at the end of the article and suggests that the reader give article reviews a try. This is one effective way to remember the article and its details while deciding the level of authority in the article. By writing a review, readers can effectively determine whether an article is credible enough to read and whether it is intriguing enough to debate the topic. All in all, article reviews are necessary for understanding a piece of literature and essential for ensuring the level of understanding between reader and writer. A concise and thorough article review clearly displays a great understanding of the article and its clear and precise details to the reader. It is a skill that is sure to be utilized in one’s near future.