example of an article review

example of an article review

The Importance of Article Reviews in Academic Research

1. Introduction

There are many different types of reviews with different characteristics, but they all have one common goal: the minimization of bias. The basic tool is the explicit formulation of the methodology to identify criteria for inclusion or exclusion of articles and how to evaluate the articles that meet the ends. The simplest form is the narrative review, typically authored by subject experts. Step by step, it answers certain questions and provides answers to hypothesis building by drawing a comparison of two alternatives to a new way of summarizing research. Source guidelines can be appropriate for this research, which is setting reformulation and often does little more than summarizing articles.

Paul Glasziou and his colleagues have defined the right research as an alternative for the current problem, and they mentioned that the first step to achieve this is to compare two alternative policies or conflicting interests by drawing their differences in an inquiry that follows the best approach. Step two is detecting and carrying rational decision, and the third step is to provide optimal care. For any kind of research, we have to rewrite our alternative. Step five is putting the right decision in medical care into practice. Current research is wasting 85 million pounds, which is the cost of abandoned research.

The reviews of this literature are more important than ever, says an article which, for the first time, defines “systematic reviews” broadly. These reviews have a crucial role in developing an evidence-based approach, whether such an approach proves to be beneficial or harmful to the public. Evidence-based approach is now widely accepted as necessary for healthcare.

2. Overview of Article Reviews

Examination of the work includes: Reviewing the selected work for publication. When reviewing, reviewers are advised to take the perspective that the work could actually be found in a library or a database, and address it as if a decision must be made to move the work from this hypothetical state to actual publication. So the reviewer will consider the entirety of the work and whether it is suitable for the article. A response is negative if a work has little or no chance of being cited in a bibliography for the article. If a work is to be cited, it should have been published and the reader should be able to find it in the provided retrievable sources. The task of the reviewer is to ensure that there is sufficient evidence proving that an old man is a viable result or if it is work that should actually be done.

What an article review does: A review can identify aspects of a work that are of particularly high quality or significance. It can offer revisionary advice that can help the author improve their work. It can also identify work that is unsuitable for publication through the identification of its strengths and failures.

Goals of an Article Review: The purpose of an article review is to allow peer reviewers to examine your work and its suitability for a particular journal. The examination of the work is very important before it is ready for publication. An article review is a process that allows the quality of a work to be assessed, and the reviewer’s findings, recommendations, and criticisms to be delivered to the author.

3. Benefits of Article Reviews

Given the sheer volume of scientific articles now available – there are more than 50 million on the internet – researchers must rely on filtering tools to make sense of the literature. Unfortunately, most reviews fail to set explicit criteria for including or excluding specific studies, write Jacob et al in their analysis of systematic reviews. This oversight leads to the authors inexplicably including some research in the review while disregarding other potentially relevant information. Offering the first comprehensive assessment of systematic reviews in medical research, they evaluate the methodological and reporting practice used in systematic reviews, and the views of those who are both using and producing them. Systematic reviews have become widely accepted as base of evidence based clinical practice. Without guidance, healthcare providers must search for the most current, relevant information in the many journals and articles, making it difficult to keep up with the literature. A traditional literature review article provides an overview of the published information in a particular subject area and selection of write my article review. Earlier reviews addressed clinical questions, but some of these fell short in method and reporting taking the form of narrative or cursory reviews. The fact that these reviews are easier to conduct than a methodical systematic review can often actually be a disincentive to do a systematic review. While there is some disagreement on the importance of article reviews, all can agree that the abundance of research articles has made staying current in a particular field a near insurmountable task. In this information-rich age, those who set aside the time to digest the best available evidence will assume their position as leaders in their field. By carefully assessing the validity of the results of a study or research article, a clinician can make informed decisions about patient care and be able to impart a higher level of care. For the academic or researcher, a well-done article review will help keep them up to date in their field, often providing direction for further research.

4. Tips for Writing an Effective Article Review

In order to write an effective article review, one must carefully prepare and review the article to form an opinion and an understanding of the article. To start with, it is important to have a good understanding of the article that will be analyzed. It is essential to identify the thesis the author is trying to prove. Also, it is important to understand the main points and conclusions the author is making. It is essential that note jotting be efficient, we do not want the author to simply copy down chunks of the article, rather paraphrase the points in his or her own words. This is a better strategy if the author is looking to use direct quotes in the article because it can help in resembling the language with the context of the article and keep it in proper context. If the notes are taken in the author’s own words, it is easy to look back and be puzzled about why he or she wrote this down. This strategy can be time-consuming and tedious, however it is a good approach for understanding the article.

5. Conclusion

Other journals are on or offline semi-scholarly publications that publish news and articles on a specific subject or professional activity. Due to this, a student must be careful in judging the type of article and whether it is an academic journal. Usually, the only distinguishing feature between an academic journal and a professional periodical is that the former has minimal display advertising and the latter will have glossy pages and lots of color. An example of an offline article would be one photocopied from a periodical, and a student would be wise to compare this to its online equivalent to judge if it were an academic article on the subject. The scope and depth of the article will dictate its suitability, particularly in the case of a source of information to a complex subject or an assignment by a student. Should the article be suitable, there will be an obvious benefit. However, a poor article choice may lead to an unsatisfactory result. In either case, were the student to apply article evaluation skills, there would certainly be room to discover and learn from mistakes in article choice.

With a journal article, the evaluator will look for signs of the article’s suitability for a particular purpose, in relation to a link between the title, the abstract, and the entirety of the article. Whether its argument is logical, if it uses evidence or opinion, and if the article possesses scope and depth. Should this have any bearing on an assignment by a student, reading an article where the article’s thesis is confused or incomplete may lead to confusion or an incomplete understanding of the subject that is being researched, by which the student may reflect this in their own academic work.

We are living in a digital age where students have the luxury of easily accessing information, especially with the advent of online academic databases. This fast and efficient access is convenient, but success in research is not merely about searching for information. Rather, it is about searching for high-quality information that has the greatest impact on the field. To retrieve the high-quality information, being able to accurately evaluate the articles found is an extremely valuable skill for any successful student. This involves a thorough understanding of the article, drawing attention to its strengths, limitations, and implications through a close analytical reading.