example article review

example article review

The Importance of Article Reviews

1. The Role of Article Reviews

The significance of article reviews can be characterized based on the huge number of letters, photocopies, and email messages received from authors who have had a terrible experience with their literary endeavors. Common issues include rejections based on careless or confused readings, delays that prevent authors from revising a submission or sending it elsewhere, loss of manuscripts, and gross changes in published material, much of the latter happening unexpectedly and without the author’s permission. In my opinion, most of this can be attributed to poor editing of text, usually a result itself of poor review and lack of feedback. So, scholars, proofreaders, editors, and interpreters, as well as instructors and private individuals who try to explain the lyrical sense of a scholarly text, can benefit from building a foundation in which detailed, objective, constructive, positive criticism becomes a regular part in the realm of academic publishing and article reviews. Another significant motivation, common among the many people who read but do not publish in academic journals, comes from the assumption that scholarly publications frequently stumble somewhere in their march towards discovery or active understanding. Such people feel that they cannot grasp the substance or the challenges of many aspects of their discipline because they are often hindered by convoluted, yet unproductive writing, or because they have missed pieces of work that are dulled by remoteness or laziness of mind. High-sounding as this may sound, those who have not abandoned the world of understanding that is truly challenging and truly rewarding will possibly want someone to find the highly revered or deeply abandoned companion and express in his presence: “You’re tough to get this?” An article review, particularly one that is available online, enables such individuals to intervene in the academic process, pursuing deeper understanding for themselves or perhaps just shadowing an author who is on an important path.

2. Benefits of Article Reviews

The sequential hypothesis would be that article reviews, in their various forms, directly or indirectly, improve healthcare, improve patient outcomes, and add value to patient care. With the emphasis on evidence-based practice, it would be very hard to argue with the fact that a well-informed healthcare practitioner, making a decision regarding patient care, based on the findings of well-executed research, is going to make a decision with a higher chance of a positive patient outcome than a practitioner who is uninformed on the topic in question. This process is vital to the UK, although healthcare systems and research cultures may differ, an understanding of the value of the process with similar goals of improving patient care can facilitate integrative research, such as systematic reviews and meta-analysis, to pool resources and share knowledge on a global scale. This will allow a much more efficient method of research and progress in the long term. Finally, educating medical students and healthcare practitioners on the process can greatly increase the value of research, as the next generation will hopefully ‘do a better job’ than its forefathers in making an overall improvement in healthcare.

Article review offers a way of constantly reading on a specific area of study and as well as outside the specific area. As a way of keeping up to date, the process is an effective way of developing an extensive database on a specific topic. A quantitative review of the literature provides an excellent tool to provide a qualitative statement or hypothesis that is grounded in a solid foundation of past research. There are definite directional goals to the process and review of literature is a specific type of research process that enables a researcher to discuss a topic in greater detail in many cases.

3. How to Write an Effective Article Review

The next step is to critically evaluate the article; this is covered in both the notes and the findings of the review. What points out? To what extent? Is the evidence relevant? Are there any weak points? Suggesting these can be particularly useful for an article review, which can be used by the reviewer as well as others seeking to understand the article. While such notes avoid use of the actual review, this can often be a useful resource.

When writing an article review, it is especially important to concentrate first on understanding the article that is to be reviewed. This means reading the article in question several times, at each occasion taking more notes than before, particularly of the author’s name, the main argument of the article, as well as the principal evidence.

4. Tips for Conducting a Thorough Article Analysis

After having articulated your argument and covered it in your paper, one of the best ways of assessing how well you have done is to analyze someone else’s argument by trying to write a paper which critiques the other one. It is, however, not very acceptable to the author of the piece you are critiquing if you just write “Your argument is weak” on page 5. It is strongly advised that you engage with his or her work using direct references to it, and this is where article analysis comes in. The objective in writing is to produce a cogent critique of the argument or arguments put forward by the author or authors, with an intelligent assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the argument(s) along with a reasonable suggestion of how the work could be altered with improved results. There are various approaches one could take in carrying this task out, but the most effective method generally involves the following two steps. First, one should have a thorough understanding of the work. Second, one should engage the argument at many different levels. An effective way to follow these guidelines is to create a checklist of all the various tasks one intends to carry out followed by a check to ensure that each task was done thoroughly. The following is a sample checklist of a method that I have found useful. Read the original article. Although this may sound like an obvious thing to do, there is more to reading an article than just reading the article. The task may be approached with different attitudes and produces varying results. The most ineffective way to read an article is to try and do it all in one go because at the end, one will have forgotten the first points that the author was making. Reading a small portion of the article and then writing a summary that contains the main point of the portion is slightly more effective, but this method is still not ideal because the deeper nuances of the point may be missed when looking through the article too fast. It is generally best to read through the article once, taking frequent breaks to check and make sure that a comprehensive understanding of the argument is being held.

5. Conclusion

The review needs to define the significance of the issue or problem that is addressed by the article’s main idea. Then it must present a critical assessment of the article, evaluating the success of its explanations and the coherence of the argument. Characteristically, an article review plans to revise and point out the main strengths and weaknesses of an article that has been done. By doing a review of multiple articles on the same subject, it identifies areas for further research and highlights what has been done in the subject. This might be proved very useful. Last but not least, an article review is mainly considered as “research on published research.” It pushes us to ask: “How can I learn to write an article review?” And it is what is detailed here earlier. Coming from all the great reasons, it is thoroughly important for guiding the public on what and what not to read.

In conclusion, it is revealing that the article review approach is something that builds a reader’s understanding of the article and an idea of whether the article is worth reading or not. It is important in developing a reasoned understanding of a subject, whether the reader is a student, a teacher, or a professional in a field. Article reviews create a better understanding of what you read while solidifying your reading comprehension. Writing an article review is an excellent possibility to develop new upcoming ideas in mind. It mainly focuses on newly developing arguments and makes quality points about it. During writing a review, the writer needs to identify different aspects of the arguments and assess the relative success of the reasoning in the article.