essay writers for hire

essay writers for hire

Exploring the Ethics and Implications of Hiring Essay Writers

1. Introduction to the Phenomenon of Essay Writers for Hire

The ethics and implications of writing academic papers as well as hiring essay builders are under-researched, despite the fact that everyone in the higher education process (including students, academics, management, decision-makers, government and industry) may be affected by the unethical usage of these services. In this paper, we identify three perspectives concerning essay writing services that this study has collected from high school students, undergraduates, graduates, and postgraduates: student, client, and society. The main contribution of this paper is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of these perspectives in order to raise awareness among individuals and institutions about the current and future consequences of illegal academic service usage.

Nowadays, if you need to hire someone to craft an academic essay for you, you may have a tough time finding a company or individual who can do this openly and legally. Many of the services and individuals offering to craft essays for students are unscrupulous. But that doesn’t mean they don’t exist—instead, they seem to live in a gray or even black market. As a result, when you look for someone to hire to craft an academic essay, you may put your academic career or even the professional career of your hired writer at risk.

2. Ethical Considerations in Hiring Essay Writers

There are a number of ethical considerations for students and institutions with respect to these services. Most of these considerations revolve around the general issue of academic dishonesty. When a student orders an essay, they likely think of hiring someone to help them through the writing process. Assistants or mentors can certainly be beneficial and may help allay the fear that many students feel about writing. However, this sort of service is specifically prohibited at nearly all educational institutions. Writing centers exist so that students may go to a third party for editing and revising without this level of commitment. Although essay writing services may distance themselves from the essay that they produce and tend to not take responsibility for the consequences of a student’s decision to submit their work, these services are in fact aiding the student in academic dishonesty and should be held accountable.

Students who fear they won’t have time to produce a quality essay on their own may turn to writing services for help. However, these companies may be operating unethically, charging large amounts of money for lesser-quality work and taking advantage of students with no recourse. All students should turn to their teachers and ensure they understand assignment due dates, expectations, and the proper research methods before paying for an essay. Ignorance is no excuse for cheating. Teachers who suspect a student’s work represents the efforts of authors other than the student should attempt to confirm their suspicions through careful consideration of the student’s writing assignments in comparison to earlier work. Finally, students who understand the hijinks that writing services employ and the moral implications of using them may be less likely to employ such services, so instructors should introduce these discussions sooner rather than later.

3. Impacts on Academic Integrity and Learning Outcomes

To interpret the algorithms and results of the next section in a meaningful context only the focus upon the application of Social Network Visualization techniques to the verification process can be seen as the innovation in this research. The second unique aspect is the practical application of these algorithms for automated identification of ghost-written essays and the challenges that the author briefly discusses around employing machine-driven verification for large student groups, over one semester. Those interested in frameworks and policies are recommended to read the Citizenship – its investigation and implications and Summary for Policymakers sections of the JPI report. Any machine-based assessment of academic integrity can provide only one layer of the credibility to the claim while the dream and potential of students who obtain such qualifications, effectively creating and adding to our pool of knowledge, remains paramount within our education system.

Some of the reasons for trying to detect ghost-writing are associated with concerns over academic dishonesty and its impacts on learning outcomes. Canavan identifies some of these reasons as a concern that the student is breaching the legitimate requirements of the university, the degree of educational benefit derived from ghost-written work or lack of it, “the unfairness and invasiveness inflicted on the genuine student who wishes to learn” in a just system, and the fact that the financial, study time or effort by others was much higher than for the ghost writer. In a global university employing students from diverse learning environments with different cultural expectations of learning and approaches to teaching, concerns around academic integrity will play a significant role. Many of the assignments that the genuine students were ghost-written remain undetected, with correspondingly less well-proven knowledge and skills, which has implications for developing educators ensuring future employability of the graduate. This leads to questions on whether, despite academic gut-feelings against ghost-writing, symbolized by timely essay deadlines and questions about learning and help-seeking preceding these deadlines, we, the education community, are able to fully articulate the ethics of ghost-writing and apply policies to it that are robust and practical and will reduce its occurrence.

4. Regulatory Frameworks and Legal Implications

Contract cheating does not refer to any direct dishonesty undertaken by the student themselves and hence the use of anti-plagiarism tools against the outputs of essay mills is inherently flawed, being unable to identify the initial commission which was outside of the scope of such services. However, contract cheating providers are technically in breach of existing copyright law, specifically in cases where the contract cheating provider does not hold licenses to provide requested materials and where ownership and copyright of the materials passes to the contract cheating provider, not to the student for whom the work was created. By further exploiting such gaps in copyright law, the same essays provided on a work-for-hire basis could be sold, creating additional income streams for these essay provider services. Positively, the potential for universities to use DMCA notices is perceived to act as a barrier to essay mills in some countries.

Essay mills have operated with significant impunity and lack of regulation for many years, and the recent calls for increased regulation demonstrate a significant gap in responses to the underlying issues of academic writing. Currently, the impact of essay mills and use of contract cheating services can be examined through a wide variety of laws, some of which may be considered as preventative and others as supportive. Countries prepare specific legislation associated with writing support, such as bills proposed to regulate essay mills. While international guidelines exist, only the Quality Assurance Agency (United Kingdom) has produced specific guidance associated with regulating essay mills, positioning such companies as being distinct from peer and faculty assistance. Other forms of national and international law could equally be applied here, making support for services associated with the commission of dishonest academic practices illegal.

5. Conclusion: Navigating the Complex Landscape of Essay Writing Services

This might seem an easy problem to solve if the central point being discussed was not a highly sensitive issue. Its complexity requires a multidisciplinary perspective. Issues that entail a discussion of “the interaction of individuals, institutions, and markets in order to exercise human values and policies,” and that therefore involve the essence that characterizes human activity with all its givers and receivers. At stake in the problem of entities that negate individual effort and should foster social responsibility are equated to real or legal people, to whom the framework of ethical laws and codes that regulate conduct and decisions granted, especially, though not only, regarding those involved in the academic activities of teaching and learning.

Whether referred to as ghostwriters, contributors, essay writers, or “hired people,” the individuals behind essay services raise, in the academic setting, a fury of conflicting opinions and theses. Between those who support their position as “small business people responding to an existing demand,” emails and professors who firmly criticize their websites, considering them as “dialectics of legality and legitimacy, manipulation and ambush, of techniques of simulation, exacerbation, plagiarism, and deceit.” Others go beyond the question of legality, including ethical and professional codes of conduct in the debate, writing about the moral dimension and the vision of man implied in them, central to organization theory. Among this multitude of conflicting available perspectives, when fuzziness is displayed instead of straight definitions, we defend the thesis that it is important to write about hired contributors in an attempt to understand this area of organizations, thus guiding the future development of academic and institutional regulations.

Summarize the initial different opinions that exist in literature and propose the formation of a code of ethics. Make a plea for the development of programs and actions, between the university and the professional world, to nurture the newly generated debate. Conclude that this might be an easy problem to solve if the central point being discussed was not a highly sensitive issue: the proof of individuality and ability of each student.