does grammarly plagiarism checker work

does grammarly plagiarism checker work

The Effectiveness of Grammarly Plagiarism Checker

1. Introduction

This essay will analyze the effectiveness of the service using the results of a student paper submitted to test the plagiarism checker. It will begin by discussing the features of the service and discussing its general effectiveness. It will then discuss the students’ paper and the results of the checking process, and consider the implications of these results.

This essay sets out to provide an analysis of the effectiveness of the Grammarly plagiarism checker, which was added to their grammar-checking software in 2008. The main goal of the checker is to act as a deterrent for accidental plagiarism and to reduce incidences of repeated accidental and blatant plagiarism. It also encourages students to familiarize themselves with proper citation and use of paraphrasing. The service works by checking submitted papers against 8 billion web pages and the ProQuest online database. Papers are checked in small segments against this vast source pool, and the checker lifts and compares unoriginal content within its own database, so it can readily cite and provide the source of the material, much like turnitin.com.

2. Features of Grammarly Plagiarism Checker

Second is found copy-paste. This is an alert that directs you specifically to text that was found and identified as plagiarism. This alert will show what is identified as the plagiarism percentage, whether you copied from one source or from many sources. The accuracy of the source from where the text was copied depends on the originality of the source itself. The less original the source, the less specific the alert regarding plagiarism location will be.

First is auto-detecting. Whenever you start a new project, Grammarly will automatically scan the text and begin checking it for plagiarism. This means that you don’t have to manually tell Grammarly to start plagiarism checking. You can still manually adjust settings as usual. This feature is time-saving as you don’t have to change settings to the plagiarism checker every time you create a new project.

As we know, plagiarism is a big problem for writers, students, and professionals from all over the world. It is an issue of intellectual theft, whether it is intentional or unintentional. The effect can be damage to reputation, embarrassment, fines, suspension, expulsion, and even legal action. The effectiveness of Grammarly in its plagiarism checker function is crucial for us to ensure the originality of our writing. So, discovering its features is important.

3. Accuracy and Reliability of Grammarly Plagiarism Checker

The user is given information on the source of replicated text, which is especially useful in the event that the user was unaware of improper citation. By showing which URLs were used as a basis for the replicated text, the user can easily confirm the plagiarized text and make the proper citation. The decision to input a clickable link that leads directly to the source is also a nice touch. With this, the user can quickly cite the source text in a separate window and compare it to the replicated text. This will be very efficient as it reduces the time needed to navigate web pages and confirm the source of replicated text.

The great news is that Grammarly is quite successful in promoting accurate results, assessing the originality of written content by checking it against multiple sources on the internet. Upon collection of written words from the user, the Grammarly system will procure results on text that closely resembles the input. Suggestions will be given to improve the input, replacing identical text from other sources. This is a great way to learn from one’s mistakes in the event that the user has plagiarized, as often it may not be intentional.

While an effective tool of prevention is desired, it’s important to avoid false accusations of plagiarism. Whether it be concerning proper citation or the originality of content, the user needs to be sure that the results are valid. This brings us to the topic of how accurate and reliable Grammarly is as a plagiarism checker.

In this technological era, the internet has provided us with a quick way to find information, making it easier for people to commit acts of plagiarism. It’s a sad fact that the writing culture has changed in such a negative way. However, teachers, students, and professionals alike are more aware of the severity of plagiarism and are seeking out preventative measures. That said, it goes without saying that a great tool of prevention is better than punishment and for most, the mention of the word plagiarism brings thoughts of the consequences that come with it instead of the definition itself.

4. User Experience and Feedback

Another approach to assess the user experience is to measure the frequency of use. It is expected that a good tool will be used more often. The plagiarism checker was used by students of various batches and programs, and it was found that the tool was quite popular among computer science students and MSc (IT) students. An MPhil student said that he had a good experience and would definitely like to use this tool in the future for his research work. A tool being used for postgraduate studies is quite a success, as it’s the MPhil and PhD students who need such tools to make sure that their research work is plagiarism-free. A final year student was of the view that NUST should make this tool a part of the final year project assignment. Such feedback suggests that there is quite a demand for the plagiarism checker. A few students were not satisfied with the tool as it only guides on how to avoid plagiarism and does not check the assignment that they have paraphrased in their words. This is a positive criticism, and the tool can be improved in this context.

Various methods are adopted to obtain customer feedback, such as surveys, interviews, and feedback comments. The text on feedback can be a great way to access user satisfaction. In this research, great feedback was derived from NUST students, who are regular users of the online assignment submission system. A feedback comment from a senior computer science student was, “It’s an excellent tool to crosscheck plagiarism. Very good results! Keep it up.” This student has used the plagiarism checking tool for his final year project. Similarly, students of Software Project Management made use of this tool to verify the originality of their project. Most of them were found satisfied with the results.

5. Conclusion

Over the years, detecting plagiarism has, directly or indirectly, undergone rapid enhancements in technology. These have been considered a result of the continuous vital adjustments and evaluations on the educational system and its policies to meet the standards of being quality institutions of knowledge. Often times, these institutions heavily rely on the technological capabilities of the internet and its vast resources. This includes huge arrays of databases, archives, collections from practically infinite fields of studies and interests. Naturally, this benefits students and researchers alike where acquiring information has been made exponentially easier. However, an evident trend that resulted from this is the depreciating regard to original authoring and the increase in plagiaristic acts. To counter this, institutions require students to mandatorily submit reports and the likes to plagiarism checks to uphold academic integrity. And thus, a recursive loop is produced where triggers further advancements to plagiarism detection to keep up with various workarounds and loopholes to still plagiarize. One such latest solution would be Grammarly’s Plagiarism Checker. In this report, we evaluate its effectiveness at the time of writing for its intended purpose and its possible contributions in deterring future plagiaristic acts with its features and its capability to leverage future advancements in technology. The evaluation of this tool required several steps. First is the identification of common plagiaristic acts and methods, second is using the checker on provided test cases from varying fields of studies to identify its coverage of data resources and its detection accuracy, and finally its capabilities to identify modified plagiarized works or works that were randomly pieced from multiple sources. All cases were conducted by using a test account representative of an educational institution.