buy the assignment online

buy the assignment online

The Ethics and Implications of Buying Assignments Online: A Comprehensive Analysis

1. Introduction to the Phenomenon of Buying Assignments Online

There is also a tendency to conflate this one phenomenon with “cheating” in general without any critical theoretical analysis of what cheating is and might be within different cultural contexts and how academics and institutions might support their students to learn from their experiences. The need for new analysis is urgent given current attempts within worldwide education systems to move learning to online formats. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of buying assignments online. The paper conducts a review of literature and policy documents to position buying assignments online in its different historical, legal, ethical, educational and social contexts.

Buying assignments online is a form of content outsourcing that is part of the gig economy. This form of contract cheating occurs via websites that facilitate transactions between students who lack the motivation or time to do their assignments and others who are willing to write them in exchange for payment. This market has been active for at least a decade and is growing. It challenges some foundational goals and practices of academic institutions and also increases inequality by enabling students who can afford to pay to access credentialing that demonstrates capabilities they did not develop. As such, these transactions have prompted much discussion within academic and educational communities. The various issues and discussions can be synthesized into seven topics. However, these discussions have largely been ad hoc, limited to a few themes and focused on essays and final assessment.

2. Ethical Considerations and Academic Integrity

The literature of academic integrity reflects the moral problems of buying assignments online. The paper, “Workload and Academic Integrity Policies,” issues student workloads as a major prompt for purchasing essays online. For these students, who consider themselves to lack control over the competitive class, they struggle to cope and consequently upload essays from the internet or purchase essays from companies. Indeed, this kind of utilitarian thinking may be tempting in a context where every assignment seems critically important and resources appear endless. Keynes once famously observed that anyone who thought about the economics of large or long-term decisions would never get married or paint schools. Only within a community where academic honesty is deeply internalized as fair and good practice are these essays of low quality – as written pieces and students. They might even only just pass.

Recent allegations against a leading UK essay mill, revealed last month, illustrate the seemingly ubiquitous practice of buying and selling academic works in the “contract cheating” industry. In a world now dominated by the internet, with its capacity to facilitate easy and anonymous transactions, it is increasingly likely that students will be buying essays because they seem cheaper or easier than doing the work themselves. Buying an academic work – whether a paper, an essay, or just a question – from someone else in order to pass it off as your own is, by any reasonable standard, highly dishonest. For others too, including university or school teachers, academic institutions, and service providers, this dishonesty poses unwanted difficulties and ethical dilemmas. For students, it can jeopardize the integrity of their character if they lack skill in critical thinking, analytical thought, and communicating ideas.

3. Impacts on Education and Learning Outcomes

All students in a class should have similar or shared opportunities to prepare for and make use of assessment. Tasks can use the ‘Wisdom of crowds principle’ and, in a less direct way, reduce the possibilities for free riding by having a peer observation and feedback element that makes it challenging for an individual student to allow anyone else to submit their work remotely. The bought paper student leverages a student’s hard work through ‘their’ work and the developed materials that are submitted. Anybody could copy them, so, in that respect, most of the student testimonials made their way to the syllabus were available for submission and had a shared provenance. It should be noted that there is no complicity on the part of the student whose work was copied as all tests are the double-blind process described in AI3, where 50% of tests, model answers, and student work are positive AI3 staff (who conducted the peer observations) and were not aware of who the work belonged to. There is an occasional case that is seen where another material, not the bought paper, is uploaded with the actual submission. As long as the bulk of the work is bought, the assignment and task finish date are met, and the comments are not the same for the paper, these students meet the case threshold and their pieces are used.

There are several consequences of buying assignments online if category covariance and student alignment schemes can be engineered to carry out the desired transactions. The most intuitive negative impacts are on education as a result of skipping projects or the avoidance of learning, or some creative work involved in tasks. Furthermore, employers may be less likely to focus on students who do not have positive educational qualifications. Therefore, assessments are generally provided to students to ensure that they come away from a unit with the minimum level of knowledge and, sometimes, competences that are expected. Assignments test students to see whether they have grasped the ‘big’ and ‘tricky’ ideas and have now also developed their knowledge and understanding well enough that they can also apply, analyze, synthesize, argue, and create in the context of their writing.

4. Regulatory Measures and Legal Implications

The increase in the number of assignments being offered for sale online also raises concerns. It shows that students are finding it increasingly difficult to hide unethical practices or performance in the field of assignments. Although there is important evidence in academic research, there is little chance that students will go to court to prosecute companies that sell assignments and essay-writing services. In addition, the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) poses a risk of assignment misconduct. The risk in question is to understand and be in accordance with ethical standards such as explaining the expectations of assignments and including self-evident anti-misconduct. The legal issues discussed in this article need to be explained as an initial point used to build policies that establish laws on illegal assignment services in Australia.

Academic integrity helps in developing a person to be more honest and reliable. That is why in the field of education, it is essential to maintain discipline in conducting research, discussions, reports, and even assignments from courses. In relation to the leaping era, academic students tend to have limitations with time to accomplish those assessments. With that being a reason, there are some illegal services that some students take in to buy assignments for completing their college. This can be countered by means of the use of college online examinations. Students are required to be more responsible for their completion.

5. Conclusion and Recommendations for Academic Institutions

This paper has described and critically analyzed the concept of online academic ghostwriting, with a focus on buying assignments. The research has drawn implications for academics and academic institutions, as well as concrete recommendations and directions for further research. The act of students purchasing assignments from writers operating online presents a contradiction to accepted ethical norms of society, conflicting with dominant educational functions of social mobility and interpersonal transformation. To align with these functions, it is recommended that academic institutions develop a strategic response that is both timely and impactful – supported by a national steering group and distinct, specialized functions. Further research regarding these actors is vital in turning conceptions of ethical ambiguity into solid ethical ground. In the meantime, assurances of care and understanding of the learner experience must take precedence. Furthermore, adaptation is essential. It is recommended that academic institutions integrate both a focus on extra-curricular activities and on-campus experiences into the highly anticipated upcoming strategies. Global extension will ensure that this paper encourages international dialogue regarding the increasing phenomenon of students purchasing assignments online. The examination of moral discourses and expenditure approximations accruing from students buying assignments lessens the level and depth of ethical ambiguity. This is developed through the critical application of an extensive ethico-economic research agenda, offering the first conceptual foundation – two grounding to critiques of online academic ghostwriting spanning more than two decades. The specific context examined in the research – that of students buying assignments, rather than commissioning essays – fills the specialist research gap that has until now persisted.

This study commenced with an examination of the plurality of stakeholders implicated by the phenomenon of purchasing assignments online. Findings revealed a legal loophole in favor of purchasing, yet rearranged understandings of responsibility and stakeholder relationship throughout the chain of services. The case for prosecutions was found to be largely contingent upon the determination to label cheating as theft, indicating the need for a deep-seated societal reorientation to effectively disincentivize assignment purchasing. Implications for academics and HEIs were found to be substantial; primarily demonstrated by an erosion of functional and conceptual understandings of the student body and learning more broadly. Ethical discourses within turn contrarily emphasized the social injustice manifested through the existence of the assignment buying industry. Collectively, conclusions suggest that assignment purchasing is a practice which academics are in general opposed to and in disagreement with, and which academia finds to be both educationally and ethically damaging. Addressing it will require HEIs to be judicious, yet flexible and adaptable.