buy history essay

buy history essay

Exploring the Impact of Economic Factors on Historical Events

1. Introduction to the Relationship Between Economics and History

Indeed, many economic questions are historical in that they concern aspects of social change that cannot be well understood without considering the action of factors occurring over a number of years or decades. The actions of individuals, firms, and governments shape long-term events and outcomes. Policymakers constantly base their decisions on assumptions about future reactions that, in turn, rely on historical patterns; and many attempts to analyze contemporary economic behavior employ various historical perspectives, be they analytical, formal, or statistical. Yet innovative works continue to emerge and should incite the economic history community to further incorporate new techniques and recently developed fields of expertise.

In recent years, the number of economic history books, conferences, specialists, research projects, and programs has risen rapidly. The sharp growth in this sub-discipline raises the question of why and how working on economic history can be interesting and original, while contributing to the field of economics and to social sciences in general. Economic historians often consider that easy access to their ample data has led to the accumulation of a significant number of studies and books dedicated to understanding the debates on history, economic growth, development, and related questions (technology and innovation), social inequality, and poverty and the demography of historical populations.

2. Case Studies: Economic Factors in Key Historical Events

Given vibrant advances in economic understanding during the last century, a natural question is the extent to which economic factors help explain historical events. A priori, such connections are likely and numerous, since human behavior is obviously influenced by resources, wealth, and incentives. Moreover, numerous advances in economic knowledge have greatly increased our understanding of human behavior, including the economic means and incentives that underlie historical commerce, governance activities of various political institutions, and demographic events, as well as shifts in wealth and the distribution of economic activity that are associated with military conflict, both civil and international. Even complex social forces, including the roles of human capital, inequality, and social institutions, have come into a clearer economic light.

Historians have also used economic reasoning, often employing economic theory, empirical testing, and the use of statistical data in case studies. These studies demonstrate how changes in economic conditions, using measures such as per capita GDP, may have contributed to or determined key historical events. Two powerful examples involve attempts to explain both the demise of the Roman Empire and the rise of fascism in Germany.

3. The Role of Economic Theories in Understanding Historical Developments

The rudiments of cost-benefit analysis give utility to both long-term positive and normative analysis. As a consequence, radical short-term violations of the framework will have long-term implications. Are market-clearing (and therefore cost-benefit) theories applicable to the study of historical development? Radical short-term violations of long-term economic principles will be countered by economic agents if overall restricted by prevailing, non-market-wage contracts. These agreements influence consumption and savings, as well as employment, production, and investment through the impact upon nominal wages and, in turn, through the price level and the profit rate among entrepreneurs. Our plea to achieve more consistency between economic reasoning and historical analysis needs support through the provision of microeconomic foundations of the most frequently discussed, but least cost-effective, macroeconomic relationships. We should observe market forces at work and explain them using microeconomic principles before embellishing these principles with wider-reaching assumptions about the economy.

The basic elements we will apply to the historical issues in question come from elementary economic theory. Specifically, one can assert that almost any economic issue can be successfully analyzed through long-term application of cost-benefit, supply and demand, and market-clearing relationships. They establish a scientific framework – coupled with the baseline assumption to which almost all economic writers adhere: that individuals seek to maximize their utility, wealth, or value. The manner in which this study chooses to present this framework is by frequently applying elementary principles of cost-benefit analysis. There is a very specific reason; historical issues have many determinants, and they usually are competing. Consequently, history often is not a one-cause-dominates relationship. But, rather, there are costs to historical ventures, and if such costs are underestimated, then their determination might be misunderstood. Furthermore, the proper application of cost-benefit principles necessarily obliges attention to each of the competing issues, whether they be individual characteristics, social and historical arenas, or regional concerns. The cost-benefit principle serves as a useful sine qua non for historical analysis and the interpretation of results, especially if the major macroeconomic issues in question reflect incomplete market-clearing in the historical specific unemployment and inflation.

4. Conclusion: Reflecting on the Significance of Economic Factors in Shaping History

Of course, my hypothesis has not been proven, and one can still consider a wide variety of interpretative stances. But this is only part of the question we have considered as we have looked at various manifestations of this militant quest for equality, which legions of academic researchers have described. The fact remains that ever since the equity revolution, economic actors have been conducting this relentless war, these countless little battles, so zealously funded by the resources achieved through the victory of another norm: another example that confirms the power and reach of economic beliefs, economic forces, and economic means, if indeed proof were needed. As after previous equity revolutions, it was obstructed from the very outset by the imperfections of imperfect man, the denial of a basic premise. We have explored the proof of one thing as the pilgrims on this long trek gradually disengage themselves: the Other, by way of a conclusion. Scratch the surface and you find him, or a variation on the theme. Driving the economic facts of the case are dozens and dozens of doctrines, labeled here with a date, which are the touchstone of our interpretations according to the methodologies we have used, in an attempt to reflect the rationality of historical events in social and economic history. No other dogma, no other system of beliefs, has achieved the same successes in such a time span. But how does a system of economic beliefs, the belief in economic forces, achieve this feat? And what happens to these beliefs in modern consumer societies? How good is the journalist’s dictum? Here lies the answer to my hypothesis.