best masters argumentative essay help

best masters argumentative essay help

Effective Strategies for Crafting a Persuasive Argumentative Essay at the Master’s Level

1. Introduction to Argumentative Writing

2. Second, instructors and readers may claim that it serves the writer as he or she must consciously understand his or her position, but it also serves to practice the dialectic, which is the process of investigating and coming to truth from a claim, to a reason, to data backing up the reason, and so forth. Finally, a technique to improve one’s skill of logic, observation, and synthesis of thought. Starting with a claim, the claim must be debatable and supportable, followed by a reason, a statement of the writer’s view or support for the claim. Following the reason is a backing or warrant, support for the reason, and subsequent data of support or evidence for the warrant. This is the general formula for classical deductive argumentation. Keeping in mind that your instructor and the text both define work as having a particular function or work, the work of the argument must be to persuade your audience to your position based on sound logical reasoning and the use of qualitative and quantitative data.

1. The validity and strength of an argumentative essay rise and fall upon the strategic placement of data as evidence and sound deduction and induction techniques. As you are tasked with crafting an argumentative essay yourself, it is imperative that you first understand some of the key components that make a strong argumentative essay. Toulmin and Rottenberg’s approach to argumentative writing defines argumentative writing as a specific type of expository writing that teaches students how to build arguments in order to persuade their audience of a position through evaluating or problem-solving. Argumentative writing is rooted in five main premises: argumentation is an exchange of ideas, although some logical reasoning is used to connect data to the claim directly, an argument is about persuasion, and it relies on data and inductive and deductive reasoning. Argumentation is both a logical and emotional appeal, tending to be crafted in a more informal style, such as an essay, and audiences often play a role in evaluating arguments.

2. Research and Evidence Gathering

In order to effectively craft an argument at the master’s level, you must first accumulate a deep reservoir of potentially persuasive data. Collecting this evidence can often serve as both the springboard for organizing your thoughts and the immersive impetus that helps you actively engage with your argument and those who will benefit from a collective understanding of the information. As you go about researching this evidence, understanding that not every source will produce useful evidence is crucial. To do so, it is important to not only rely on reputable and diverse sources but also to take action to develop a deep understanding of both the documents and the experts or audiences who have written them. The overall research process can be segmented with specific, associated strategies that provide ample access to a range of data and more information.

An argumentative essay is an effort to persuade readers to accept a claim, and to do so effectively at the master’s level, you need to support these claims with sufficient amounts of drafted, authoritative evidence. This contemporary and credible research can be gathered through five important areas of experience: talking with others and increasing exposure, searching online and in databases, studying scholarly sources and published essays, field research, and real-world involvement. Each of these areas of expertise includes specific strategies for gathering good information that encompasses a spectrum of current thought and allows for a well-rounded, persuasive exploration of the information.

3. Structuring Your Argumentative Essay

The argumentative essay, even one at the master’s degree level, should cause the reader to not only understand the argument being presented but also find genuine significance or compelling circumstances regarding the argument. This can be achieved by using effective organization and writing strategies, such as providing arguments in a logical order, connecting to the audience by accommodating more than one point of view when the evidence seems to support it, allowing for “cognitive breaks” such as labeling steps, or using persuasive or emotionally engaging language throughout the essay to help guide the reader as he reads. You may find fairly compelling results by including pathos, ethos, and logos throughout your argumentative essay, but it comes with a variety of secondary and tertiary effects. For example, the use of pathos may cause the reader to empathize with you and/or become emotionally connected to your argument, greatly increasing the chances of being able to find them in your favor. Keep in mind, however, that effective use of pathos can make the argument biased. Ethos, similarly, for a master’s level essay, will emphasize the writer’s expertise and knowledge and strongly support the use of statistics. Logos, in particular, will pull off statistical data for effect but may require the writing to include appeals to emotion because the audience is accustomed to seeing it.

An argumentative essay at the master’s level should contain a basic structure that includes an introductory paragraph, the thesis statement, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each of these structural sections contains its own implicit guides for what should be included. Shortly, the introduction should not only provide contextualizing facts or background but hook and hold the reader, possibly also reflecting on his or her standpoint to encourage genuine interest. The thesis statement briefly summarizes the main body points and serves as an assertive statement to be argued. The body paragraphs contain the “meat” of the essay, including all primary and secondary sources, data, and facts that are there to prove the thesis statement and the writer’s opinion on the matter. The conclusion should not only restate the thesis from the intro but give some indication of the logical straightforwardness of the argumentation and provide, in short, final thoughts.

4. Refuting Counterarguments

Anticipating opposition is vital for effective refutation. If an essay is persuasive, it is nearly certain that some responders will disagree. The ability to anticipate and refute opposition displays critical engagement, as well as an indication that the writer has thought comprehensively and deeply about their argument. An engaging and persuasive essay goes two steps further by acknowledging and fully addressing opposing viewpoints. Like all other facets of an argument, doing this convincingly can often be more persuasive than simply stating your point. This kind of counterargument refutation is crucial in a master’s argumentative essay, as it demonstrates that your argument acknowledges its limitations and goes beyond denial to address and even perhaps incorporate opposing viewpoints. If written successfully, addressing counterarguments can bolster your central argument and make it more compelling.

Of course, no argument is bulletproof, and no argument exists without opposition. Even the most strongly held beliefs can be argued against, whether from flawed logic, a system of beliefs (religious, political, etc.), or from conflicting or incomplete data. Effectively refuting counterarguments relies heavily upon a writer’s logic and ability to persuasively contradict an opposing viewpoint. Anticipate, acknowledge, and refute opposition convincingly in order to establish your side of the argument more authoritatively. When executed effectively, this counterargument refutation not only disproves the other side but also explains why. Providing readers with an understanding of exactly why an opposing viewpoint falls short strengthens your own argument. Refutation discourages readers from further considering the counterargument and persuades them to accept your reasoning.

5. Concluding Your Argumentative Essay

Once you have revealed your conclusion, go through and universally remind your reader of your supporting arguments, your main points, subpoints, and research findings, that led to this conclusion. This can be done in a number of ways, such as mirroring your introduction, offering a more straightforward, direct reiteration, or recommending the practical steps your reader might take to bring about the solution you have proposed. Every essay needs a good conclusion, or conclusion of some sort, to reinforce its main argument one more time and remind the reader again what each point had to do with what the argument was ultimately trying to say. Sometimes, the prose in an argumentative essay can be so dense, rippling with points and evidence, that one main idea can get lost in the writing. A conclusion is an important rhetorical opportunity to leave a reader with a good impression. A conclusion should wrap up, or at least redirect the reader. You want your reader to know that the end of your essay is near and that you are locking up shop. When you reinforce your central argument and momentarily revisit your main points in these ways, your reinforcement is only bolstered.

When it comes to arguing your point persuasively, you must anchor your argument, or thesis statement, by repeating it throughout your essay. Repetition in the conclusion is a nice way to wrap up your argument. By bringing repetition back, you can do a bit to reveal the evolution of your solution as well. For instance, something like, “In conclusion, to address this critical problem with such pervasive effects, we must…” draws attention to the size of the problem in terms of geographic and population scale before using the same phrase and somehow amped up the solution. Indeed, “to address this truly ubiquitous and colossal issue, I assert that we must…” wraps up with a powerful sense of redirection while still adding a note of assurance to your remarks.