article reviews example

article reviews example

The Art of Writing Scholarly Article Reviews

1. Introduction to Article Reviews

What are the main insightful implications? This is your article, will you gain anything out of it? This article reviews offer scholars the opportunity when you write it to develop and enhance skills in developing and formatting scholarly works and offers scholars and referee. It is a chance to distinguish yourself before you submit your first piece of scholarly work and register your presence. Therefore, writing of article reviews can be a training exercise for mentoring students. The key objective is to familiarize student within norms of the expectations of the scientific community for journal publishing. Writing a review for all students of the introductory activities, might be a kind of assurance procedure in which the manuscript initiates by the author is sufficiently mature. This practice of aspiring understanding and communication of clear ideas creates constructive academic relationships such as developing of students writing and improving the writing of the authors who often exceed assumptions and academic writing. This platform established a guide to develop advanced learning communities, academic engagement, academic professional development and training for careers students.

In the first part of the article, the author sets the scene and introduces you to many people who can be your guides and mentors through this complex process. Everyone has advice, everyone seems to offer talking of scholarly journals that include empirical and theoretical contributions in the area of management of information resources. It is assumed that every reader is familiar with the basic structure of a scholarly article, and the main building blocks that they contain. The article review is a light quick exercise that involves skimming through the article first time through and gathering information from it. It is in human nature to ask two questions. Not ‘So what? We often use models as tools to gain insight into complex problems. The author attempts to tell you what advantages readers gain by reading an article.

2. Key Components of a Well-Written Article Review

Well-written article reviews offer you the opportunity to provide feedback on an author’s expertise, research methods, and overall conclusions. Through providing such feedback, you participate in a process of collective peer review. Promote unequal relations of power and privilege based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or other ascribed characteristics.

Well-written article reviews communicate the main message of the article, as well as provide an analysis of the specific things the article is trying to accomplish. Let’s take a look at some important things on article reviews. Well-written article reviews present clear, evidence-based analyses that will help you, as a member of a discipline or profession, think critically. Such analyses demonstrate the ability to think critically and permit you to better understand the racial, ethnic, or gender-based power differentials and inequalities that affect the communities you serve.

A clearly stated research question. After the general subject is determined, the researcher crafts a research question to guide the investigation of the general subject. For example, the researcher may focus on the effects of U.S. and international regulations requiring installation of ballast water management systems. The research question is the specific issue or problem that the researcher will address. If the research question is not clearly stated, the reader will not know what issue the author intends to address.

A clearly presented general subject. From the perspective of an individual researcher, the general subject is the specific issue that the researcher intends to investigate. For example, an individual researcher may be interested in the effects of various types of maritime regulations for preventing ship-source pollution. The appropriate general subject is regulations for preventing ship-source pollution. Without a clear statement of the general subject, the reader will not know what the researcher is investigating with the subsequent research.

3. Strategies for Analyzing and Critiquing Research Articles

Signals that you are reading a review article will help you make a clear determination of exactly what kind of paper you are reading. The existence of detailed research summaries or evidence in the paper should be recognized, so that you may see words or phrases such as “focus of the review,” explanation of “what is known,” “focus points,” or “research problems.” If the review in question is being read for a course or to select a review article to write, trying to make sense of it, remember that the question is “what is known and not known?” Ideally, the evidence table within that section will address critical elements necessary for an interpretation, not merely provide raw material for a narrative that is devoid of a central argument.

Begin with a question that will often be answered in the research studies that typically find their way into the journals you are assigned to read. Ask yourself: “Why did the researcher do this study? Why is this topic important? What are the practical, scientific, and theoretical implications of the study?” In other words, place the study phenomenon in a broad context. Do not dive into the fine points and details of how the study was conducted before considering the implications and contributions. Briefly provide the review article’s rationale, the study phenomenon, and a general guide for the review.

4. Effective Writing Techniques for Article Reviews

Grammar, spelling, statistics, and formatting checks compositions or writing should be systematically checked and revised. Prior to considering article structure and headings, authors should evaluate the grammar and mechanics of their writing. Poor writing, spelling, grammar, and punctuation are the first things readers notice, and may impact the credibility of a review. Scholars spend a great deal of time researching and writing. However, the quality of the writing will determine whether or not the valuable contribution each piece of writing makes is reflected in the number of citations that manuscript receives.

Purposefully choose the type of writing and language. Many research summaries or reviews are typically referential in nature. That is, an author should aim to be as objective as possible and check your personal bias at the door to provide readers with a balanced perspective and presentation of the work at hand. Furthermore, using different writing styles can help effectively summarize and review multiple research papers. For reviews, maintain a third-person perspective while paper summaries are typically written in first person.

In writing an article, ensure that paragraphs have strong topic sentences and that each paragraph supports your topic sentence. Additionally, each article review should highlight the main points and those details supporting the main points. Use specific, clear, and concise language to ensure that those points are best made and therefore best emphasized. Additionally, use topic headings and subheadings. The key benefits are that subheadings guide to future article writers, to better organize the author’s thoughts, and to help identify the paper’s individual sections, which is especially useful when searching for specific information in a longer article review or for a specific section in an article review to support a paper’s claims.

5. Conclusion and Best Practices

The art of writing scholarly article reviews shares significant differences and similarities with the art of writing research papers. Unlike in research papers, the reviewer can afford an opinion, both on the content of the article and on your assessment. A theme, be it research, review, or critical article, differs from a true research paper. Being a journal article, it more often presents a research study, experiment, discussion, or hypothesis, freed from the writing style and brevity required of an extended project. To decide if an article of interest publishes in a desired journal or to discover the quiddity of the article, including its secret ingredients, it is necessary to explore its abstract and keywords prior to purchasing it. News, journal articles, instructional videos, and books compose the prime sources.

Peer-reviewed academic journals are the safeguard of scholarship. They embody stringent editing, literary craftsmanship, sophisticated argumentation, and comprehensive citation. Reviews of academic articles abstract the quintessence and deliver it to the reader’s desktop. You browse through specialized journals, determine a suitable article, and then write the review, relaying its contents, critiquing its approach, and appreciating its relevance to so many others. Contrary to opinions entertained by the vast majority of academics and students, writing a scholarly article review is advantageous as well as educative. Rather than shy away from the challenge of judging, summarizing, or synthesizing the article you love or are mystified by, grab the precarious duty with enthusiasm and energy, twirling between analysis and opinion.