article review introduction example

article review introduction example

The Importance of Article Reviews

1. Introduction

Next, we explore what article review is and the benefits of doing it. According to Wikipedia, an article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess someone else’s article. The majority of article reviews that are done by reviewers just summarize the article since they thought assessing an article is a hard task. But what they do not realize is that by just summarizing the article, not only does it provide a little knowledge to those who read it, it does not improve the reviewer’s understanding about the article that he/she had reviewed. By assessing the article, it will provide a better understanding to the reviewer since the reviewer will read the article carefully and understand every single part of the article. For example, if the article that you review is about software, by reading and understanding the article, it might give you an idea to develop and improve the software. By assessing the article also, you can give critics if the article has any weaknesses and give some suggestions for improvements. By doing these, it can improve your skills in giving ideas and can give benefits to the article’s author.

As stated by researchers, in the beginning, you will feel that writing an article review is a hard task. This is because at the beginning, you do not have the skills to craft a good article review. But you do not have to worry. The more you conduct article reviews, the better your skills will be. You will realize the importance of article review and the benefits that you can get from it.

To craft a good article review, you need to provide a summary which highlights the main points of the article. Also, analysis and evaluation of the article must be done. But to craft a good article review and understand the article that you are going to review takes time. That is why article review is an important task for those who are doing research related to their project. It is also an important task for those who are doing a PhD degree since it can improve their writing and understanding skills.

2. Benefits of Article Reviews

At a personal level, one of the most powerful incentives for academics to review is the increased understanding a reviewer gains about the peer review process itself. It is common for those new to the process to be anxious about providing negative comments and in general reviewers tend to assume that acceptance of an article for review means that the reviewed article is of similar quality to one being accepted for publication. This is not always the case and reviewers need to recognize the importance of quality control for published material. Summaries of clinical content including assessments of validity, missing data and clinical significance are crucial to the practice of evidence-based medicine, yet extrapolation of research data into clinical practice is an area often poorly covered by medical publications and many clinicians and allied health providers lack the skills required to perform a quality analysis of the literature. A thorough understanding of what constitutes a quality review is essential for these practitioners to become reviewers.

Identifying benefits differs dramatically from evaluating activities such as teaching. Whereas the quality of teaching can be enhanced and developed through the provision of formative feedback, the stimulus for creating an article and the outcomes arising from its review can be influenced by a myriad of factors, many of which have little to do with the quality of similar articles. Nevertheless, an awareness of the benefits of your editorial contributions can provide great feedback to reviewers, increase the likelihood of authors selecting your journal for submission, and stimulate interest in the academic community for post-publication review.

3. Tips for Writing an Effective Article Review

3. Article Summary: An article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess another person’s article. This involves making a summary of the article so that you can analyze the work using criteria from the writer. You can take according to what is written on the entire article, but it’s necessary to make a paragraph-by-paragraph or section-by-section summary. In summary, only the topic and the result of the research conducted in the article.

2. Organize the review: Essential is to re-read and edit your article you have read. This will involve making some changes to be certain that some ideas are clearer to you and to eliminate overlong descriptions. Editing the article can be need to be done a number of times. That’s why it is important to allow yourself enough time to write as to do it quickly, but with many mistakes. On the first reading of the article, make brief notes about main points and topic. These will help structure the review. Compare your report to the article content. What does the article try to say? Did you manage it?

1. Use a persuasive, open tone: The article you are expressing what do you think about that research article. The tone you should use should be persuasive. Tell how the research was conducted, the method involved, and the results obtained by the study. This thing can help you in your critical review. The simple definition of a critical review is “writing which evaluates and analyzes another work (or article) in an argumentative way.” So, the tone of writing should be argumentative. This job can be done by highlighting that article. Critical review is also the writing job. The information content is taken from other sources. The article review is conducted to summarize the article. And then the summarization is written and then will be analyzed with the related sources.

Guideline 1. Use a persuasive tone in your response.

4. Common Mistakes to Avoid in Article Reviews

There are a number of common mistakes that students make when writing article reviews. These include writing a summary of the article rather than a review, and writing it in the wrong tense. This will include giving short background information about the author and then the summary of the article, as well as lack of interpretation throughout the review. Other common mistakes are writing the review so that it is more a reflection on themselves or their experiences, and not including direct quotes from the article. Written article reviews should always focus on the writing and style of the article as well as the author’s intent. If the review gives the reader’s personal opinions then they have not given the article its full justice. This can also mean positive remarks and feedback. Even negative criticisms act as solid advice to the author, and every good article review needs to feed back to the article’s author. Step back, write the review as if talking to the author. A last precaution is to avoid making statements without saying why. If you have made a criticism or praise it is always best followed up by a quote or point from the article itself. This article was reviewed to show that an essay is just an article written in a particular format. With that said it is quite possible that an article review could prove to be an effective method of study for essay writing. With that said, good luck and I hope this article review has helped you understand more on how to write one.

5. Conclusion

The study asserts that gardening with bush tucker plants will put food on the table with the least work, while enriching the quality of the environment on Australian allotment sites. Without making any lifestyle changes for environmental benefit, cultivation of bush tucker plants enables modern gardeners to get back to nature and play a role as land managers improving the quality of wild spaces around their allotments. In addition, there would be increased engagement with environmental issues among allotment holders, in effect providing a radical new direction for people to engage with environmentalism at a grassroots level.

Nevertheless, the majority of allotment holders have limited spare time and thus an interest in a low maintenance, low cost, and incredibly easy to implement approach to gardening. As the population of plot holders ages, the older gardeners will be seeking an easy alternative to the customary, physically demanding method of gardening. At the same time, undesired environmental impacts and the weekly cultivation cycle of traditional vegetables no longer fit with the modern gardeners’ ever-evolving ethos.

However, due to the finite and variable lifespan of allotments, there is a need for a flexible and diverse planting system that is quick to establish and start producing. Adoption of such a system by younger plot holders also sets the stage for a lifetime of successful gardening without the need for heavy labour.