article review examples

article review examples

The Importance of Article Reviews

1. Introduction

1. A narrative review explains the existing knowledge on a topic based on all the published research available on the topic. 2. A systematic review is to get an overview of primary research on a specific topic by using explicit methods to search, appraise, and analyze the data in order to understand the broad concepts of the topic. 3. A meta-analysis is typically a systematic review using statistical methods to effectively pool the data from a large set of trials in an attempt to interpret the findings.

A review article is an article which summarizes and analyzes the work of various authors on a topic in a well-defined manner. Review articles can be of 3 types, broadly:

Realizing the importance of a review article in today’s world, in which the number of publishing academics is at its peak, but there are very few people among us who know the exact art of writing a review article. Although there are many ideologies for writing a review and each expert considers his own way, there are still some common points which are to be kept in mind for writing a review article. This article provides a comprehensive review on how to write a good review article and will prove to be a good guide to all those people who are in the process of writing a review article. This article was inspired by comments of the 2 editors of a medical journal on review articles.

2. Benefits of Article Reviews

When you read an article review example, you gain the benefit of learning from an example and seeing how a review should be formatted. Additionally, by reading an example, you can get a better understanding of what is expected of you when you are reviewing an article for a class. If you have been assigned a peer-review for an article, an example of a peer-review you can find online is a great resource. By reading an example one can determine how specific a review one must write and can determine the appropriate tone for a peer-review. Finally, by reading an example of a reviewed article, you can gain a better understanding of the article in question. Sometimes articles are ambiguous and difficult to understand. By reading an example of a review of the article, you can get a better understanding of the article and see if it is relevant to your area of research before reading the article itself.

3. How to Write an Effective Article Review

There are two places in which the content of your writing can be evaluated; one is the logical structure of the paragraphs, and the other is the evaluative comments regarding the article that is being reviewed. It is often useful to measure how well the author has accomplished these goals. In the case of the article referred to with this document, an outstanding balance in the descriptive and evaluative elements is present. The evaluative comments are not the longest sections; however, I believe that they are the most important factors of this review. The author has accomplished an outstanding job in providing a detailed summary of the article as well as evaluating the research. This is done by preparing an outline and applying it to the logical structure of the article. This method is very effective and makes for a clear representation of the evaluation. This author is able to provide descriptive details as well as an overall evaluative summary of the article. Finally, the summaries combined with the evaluative comments are a very effective method. The detailed evaluation provides a clear and quick determination of the article’s value. This can be seen in the final statements of the review.

4. Examples of Well-Written Article Reviews

This analysis is very big picture oriented and is somewhat taking a step back to look at the issues from an ideal vantage. This differentiation of the ideas in the article helps the reader to get a clear understanding of what has taken place. This is important as we begin to see the implications of what has been done and still it serves today as a comparison for recent global integration by developing countries. This usually is the first question that what has integration done at any level. Depends on what the integration was, steeling a march, and global integration by definition could simulate similar attempts by the G-7. Finally, a comparison would be useful in assessing whether there have been similar results between G-7 behaviour and the integration moves of the various developed countries.

The review is a good summary of the article. It flows very logically and coherently and ensures that the reader understands the important points of the article. The reviewing author is able to distinguish between the primary and the secondary claims of the article which is P1: G-7 countries have done strategic integration vis-à-vis others and P2: The strategic moves have it reversed relative to an earlier to garner two hypotheses. This leads to an interesting proposition as posited in the introduction that the G-7 countries followed this integration to execute some a specific sequence of actions that were meant to serve as an emulation of what the developed nations wanted to be achieved for the Developing countries’ integration in to the world economy and the latter P3: The developed countries integration has a mixed and frequently contradictory result as to the impact on the developing countries. By understanding this points of article, the author wants to assess the impact of integration on developing countries.

Sushma Jaiswal’s article on Strategic Implications of Global Integration for the Two Big Emerging Markets has a clear title to guide the reader in understanding what the article will be about. The review does an excellent job in summarizing the article by first laying down the foundation of how global integration has taken place with the G-7 countries and the move to go below the surface by looking into assessment of behavior and importance of studying such situations. With this, the author is directly focusing on the way to analyze the strategic behavior of the G-7 countries compared to the previous works which have focused primarily on the welfare effects of open policy. This sets the stage for the reader and the topic of analysis that is to follow in the article.

1. A review that gives a clear summary of the article

5. Conclusion

In the meantime, they can apply the procedure of critical evaluation to expand learning about new developments in research done, advancing skills in the appraisal of data or information, and careful implementation of research findings into practice. Normally, an article review can also improve the rudimentary skills with information resources. This includes the detail of skimming the article in search of uniqueness and originality and the ability to present a suitable understanding of an article. With the passage of time, all of these undoubtedly translate into a well-rounded skill in information literacy. Last but not least, the ecological skills between researchers who are still under and/or have the same area of interest. This is because article reviews usually require a discussion and opinion of another person or group.

In our humble evaluation, we declare that authors, researchers, academicians, professionals, and students have gained a lot of benefits from article reviews. To point out the numerous benefits, there are too many. For instance, an article review can assist an author in having an ever-escalating knowledge of a field, in which experts can appraise, criticize, and synthesize the research and findings of others.