Strategies for Writing an Effective Article Review
The goal of this essay is to develop skills in dispassionate and critical writing. This article gives a very good account of how a methodical process and some strategies will improve the students’ experience of writing article reviews. The author speaks from experience, as the strategies have been tried and found successful. The article explains what the review should consider and we are better placed to craft a comprehensive and relevant piece. Suggestions are very precise and clear. For students who would like a better grade, this article will work well as a guide. As a critical reader engage in a work in an attempt to express the reader’s understanding of it, article review demands the critical reader to use the evidence, reason and logic to demonstrate that the understanding is reasonable and valid. Students are supposed to engage at a higher level of thinking and writing and move from narrative to critical analysis when they are writing an article review. Besides knowledge and level of understanding, the writing methods count a lot in an article review. The review writing teaches the students to improve the writing skills as well as the creative skills. This article provides a good understanding of what is required in article review. It shows that the student has already understood the content. The writer has provided the student with the points to consider in article review writing. With such strategies, not only will students succeed in the class, but also the student will find out how to become a productive academic, no matter in which area. This article presents a process of reassurance and finding security in writing a formal, psychological emptiness which surrounds a kind of ‘intellectual loneliness’ and that the draft upon which one labors will never be perfected. Such type of emotion is common as it suits the fantasy when criticism will be made – self-dislike in private and admiration in public. With this process, students will soon realize that critique is about strategies employed, not about mistakes…help the reader understand the choices. This may lead to a fair-minded form of persuasion. The reader is making the same type of analysis that the writer himself/herself would be making, not necessarily looking for mistakes but for their skills and strategies…why this was most persuasive, this evidence most conclusive. Well, approval is a very powerful motivator, and if the student employ strategies probably taught in, the student will be better able to read articles in a new way and use evidence and therapy in a very tolerant awareness. Work will not evoke time – presence. Work is left open for future readers. Work has moved through time – to a critical reader in the same time in which the response to be written. Yes, ideas are moving through the time for the society. However, don’t lose sight of the deeper personal significance for the review. All critical reading derive from an in-depth analysis of an oral work. Every challenging thought has come from a frame of reference at some point in our life experience. Each review is the positive one, hunger will cease for a pursuit of something else. Together, we got a motive, some sort of meaning is achieved whenever a challenge has been completed. Every criticism moves a person open through a series of explanations, a trusted form of knowledge and times of decisive actions. The result of a critical reading really is to prove that the way other folks’ research and opinions has impacted the reader…where has the maybe like of the writer had prove? Every creative or intellectual endeavor because it’s set against a critical reading, no matter how biased. Thus, a critical reader strives to return to the text.
Students need to distinguish the key features and the xafs of article review writing well as the criticism. Writing a scholarly article can be confusing, particularly when the creator fails to convey his own thoughts clearly in the article. Creative ideas and strong attention to details are the two fundamental qualities of article review writing. As students advance from lower levels to higher levels of educational studies, they are consistently asked to use critical analyses and reviews for presenting and supporting their own works. Actually, creative writing or any other type of writing will be given to every student except for writing criticism gives students a kind of freedom of what self-observers they might be. With this kind of assignment, students not only interpret what uses the xafsroom but also make a critical assessment of the article; reveal the positive and negative aspects of the article. Why do the teachers request article reviews? To establish the purpose of your writing. To show the rightness of your assessment. To convey what you wish to the reader. To present the main features of the article. To provide history. To express different perspectives that are valid as well. As a rule, teachers actually appreciate article reviews to be set just in control and left to the limit. This may be more straightforward and genuine for scientific work. However, for morality organize, such as writing, students’ interpretation may be usually welcomed after the readers have received the summary from the academics. Nowadays articles can be accessed from many sources, for example, web articles can be accessed from any online libraries, journal sites, and even online bookshops. Besides that, academic journals and periodicals tend to provide better articles. In any article review, it is important that students focus on the article’s main ideas, plot, supporting details instead of highlighting solely on the evidence of the author’s credibility. Also, every student can’t help but ask about the topic; every student is allowed to offer their own commentary on the review but only if it is reasonable and valid. But, just like any other type of assignment, students are only to refer from the original article; students are not allowed to try to do the assignment simply by reading the existing review. Actually, students may start to communicate their expectations directly to the readers so clearly it is not necessarily that much advice to be revealed in article reviews.
When writing a well-written article review, it is important to begin with a thorough understanding of the article you plan to critique. Reading through the article once to gain the main idea may prove insufficient. It may also be helpful to write down questions and thoughts that come to mind while you study the material. Your opinions as you comment on the topic and its relation to your other readings such as books or journal articles will be more credible and valid. In addition, discussing the article’s importance with friends or classmates may offer insights you had not thought about while writing notes alone. Forming a quick outline like the summary points in the article and your reading notes before beginning the writing process will allow not only a better overview of the article’s key aspects, such as its purpose and its main point, but also review any thoughts that have been made during the reading. A well-structured critique will demonstrate a person’s understanding of the article presented. That’s why formal article critiques call for students to combine their subjective opinion with an objective professional response. This will provide potential readers with an expert view about the article, which in turn may create an interest to read the article.
When starting your critique, it is helpful to begin with the author’s main point for each section. A good article review contains a summary of the article with a personal response supported by evidence and reason. Start by visiting the writing center. The experts there can help you read a piece critically – and they can help you find the weaknesses in your drafts. Before you begin writing, it might be a good idea to compile a list of possible main points, and jot down how you could use evidence to support each of them. Also, try to map out a rough schedule, e.g. “Monday, read and take notes”, “Tuesday, prepare the first draft”, “Wednesday, write the summaries for class discussion”, etc. This approach can help all writers, but a break in routine – such as a new academic task – can make it particularly effective. Even students who might not be squeamish about seeking feedback on their everyday work sometimes feel that a junior’s critique is unwelcome or intimidating. But writing is a process and it does have to accept that feedback is essential. So remember, if you’ve been asked to provide a critique (to tear apart and identify weaknesses in the text) this doesn’t mean that you should be negative from beginning to end. A critique is a balanced analysis of a piece of writing which either agrees or disagrees – constructively – with the main argument and supporting evidence presented by the author.
There are various ways of publishing a review writing and the strategy of writing a review is based on the type of article review you are drafting. Over the years, many scholars have come up with different strategies for writing effective article reviews. The main aim of review writing is to provide a forum where researchers can share their points of view as well as experience about any particular research. Based on the knowledge and experience in a particular discipline, different areas have developed their own strategies and an effective review contributes more to progress and growth in the research area. These areas include science, social science, psychology, forensic, and also business. A review provides constructive feedback to the author. It also helps the rest of the researchers in the field in finding the relevant information about the research, and it can also be a way of addressing and exploring a particular research question. In conclusion, article writing and reviewing are some of the interesting tasks which get the best from the researchers and also their writing and gaining strategies help and guide others too. Also, following the strategies of writing article reviews focusing on the specific area such as science, technology, and education should end up in success and quality work.
