professional case study editing service ca

professional case study editing service ca

Enhancing the Quality of Case Studies: A Guide to Professional Editing Services

1. Introduction to Case Study Editing

Case studies are a bit of a science project. The data is wrangled, there’s a hypothesis, and the key is telling a compelling story that convinces readers of the hypothesis. In the language industry, we don’t throw out results just because the story might be a little rough; we tailor the documentation until it says everything we need it to say. Whether you call it developmental edit, phone a friend, ask for a critique, or bring in a ringer, every case study benefits from outside opinions. So if you’re an LSP slugging it out by yourself, consider hiring a pro to do it for you. Have you ever had a case study professionally edited? What did you expect? Was it worth it?

There are professional copyeditors and proofreaders who help academics clean up their works before submission to journals. In fact, some universities have dedicated resources available to students and faculty to make this service affordable, offering dissertation editing services. You, a subject matter expert in the field of language of corporations, could produce an outstanding case study, but something goes wrong in the development pipeline, resulting in a case that is sometimes less effective at teaching. These issues are generally out of the writer’s control. Writers of case studies are not instructional designers. You are not editors. But that does not mean that the case study could not benefit from a bit of editorial TLC. The goal of professional case study editing is to reduce those non-content related pain points and to ensure that the final product is the best teaching tool it can be.

2. Key Elements of Effective Case Study Editing

Over the years, as a selection criterion for publication in some journal issues and to choose the best works that will showcase the high-quality standards of an annual event publication, we have edited numerous case studies. While some of these works are satisfying, many propose marginal improvements and “tweaking” around margins. In this guide, we discuss the components of a case study and, in the process, some of the techniques we have found to work. These are the elements in professional editing that contribute directly to the creation of high-quality case studies.

The components include: – An authoritative case study report. – Literature and label placing. – Constructing messages. – Data. – Data analysis. – Pictures. – Reviewing drafts. A combination of improved content and copy results in a major redesign. – Add case study components to the flow chart (see below).

Because case study content is not officially “peer-reviewed” in professional publications, it is often a significantly less rigorous process. However, the best case studies are thoroughly reviewed, but under different criteria and with a different purpose in mind than “research” studies that appear in the usual corporate regulatory and academic journals. Writers who understand the case study evaluation process are better able to interest editors – and their proposed reviewers – in accepting these works for publication. By discussing what happens when a case is accepted for presentation or publication, this guide offers a thorough look at the becomes of editorial review and editing.

3. Benefits of Utilizing Professional Editing Services

There are likely numerous reasons why case writers do not have their teaching cases professionally edited. Here, however, we concentrate on arguments in favor of this investment. Our primary contention is that well-written, grammatically sound, coherent, tightly argued, accurate, persuasive, and effective cases are more likely to be utilized by instructors. Professional editing can help writers to develop such cases. In doing so, writers enhance the professionalism of their own and their institution’s reputations. They add legitimacy and authority to their cases, thus attaining access, exposure, and credibility.

There are at least 10 important benefits associated with utilizing professional editing services: (1) Professional editing enhances the overall quality and readability of a case in terms of formatting, readability, substance, and structure. (2) Professional editing ensures that the case is accessible and impactful to a diverse readership, including those for whom it is a second language. (3) Professional editing can reduce the time and effort involved in preparing a case for publication by addressing problems during the early stages of development. (4) Professional editing helps to cement the case’s credibility by, as Spinellis (2016, viii) and editors of many introspective case collections make explicit, conferring legitimacy on the authors. (5) Professional editing can also significantly expedite the case development process by the ready market awareness it bestows on cases. (6) The professional editing of a case not only increases its appeal to instructors but also enhances the perception of the authors and their institutions. (7) Professional editing can generate useful feedback and possibilities for networking. (8) Editors understand what is expected of a good case. (9) Writers can extend the influence of their work through their connection with the editorial process. (10) When seeking external funding for case development, the utilization of professional editing and other support mechanisms can significantly enhance applications’ joint chances of success.

4. Best Practices for Selecting a Professional Editing Service

Selecting the most suitable professional for your editing needs can be a daunting task. The interactive diagram on the right sets out seven of the best practices for choosing from more than 80 professional editors for case studies who can help increase your chances of acceptance for publication in Comparative Politics. The two resources below provide tips for choosing suitable editors and nurses, and there are dozens of tabular editors and researchers to help you apply the following methods in your search. Hiring a professional editor to help you improve this scrapping can be of great benefit to most authors. We have exceeded the number of words we can publish, and we have reached as many potential authors as possible. You may also have the option to publish this version online or in print. We summarize empirical evidence on the impact of case studies on research using quantitative data.

First, regardless of the discipline or field of study, we recommend that you choose a professional editor with expertise in editing case studies. Seek out someone with professional writing and editing experience in comparative politics or a related field who can offer information on writing conventions and potential audiences for your case study. In general, we also urge hiring an editor who publishes in English over an editor who publishes in another language, assuming both editors have experience with case studies. Second, we highly recommend choosing a professional who has experience in Comparative Politics. An experienced editor is more likely and able to provide effective input for crafting a publication-worthy case. Finally, and as a supplement to these published lists, we advise hiring an editor who comes recommended. Choose editors with whom your academic colleagues or mentors have worked in the past and would recommend.

5. Case Studies of Successful Editing Transformations

QRM: International Journal of Undergraduate Research. (2019). Improving the clarity and coherence of case studies. 3(1), 227-231.

Case Studies of Successful Editing Transformations

After receiving professional comments on their initial drafts, authors came to us, the editorial team at QRM: International Journal of Undergraduate Research, requesting help. They want to know what kind of service we could provide to edit the English for coherence and overall quality. In the earlier drafts, the authors were vague in presenting key points, and redundancy cluttered their reasoning. The authors also incorrectly referenced data about the finishing times of runners in the marathon. We advised authors to work to clarify their purpose, organize ideas, eliminate wordiness; also, decide what content to keep. We edited Authors 1 and 2 to varying degrees: reducing wordiness, clarifying ideas, and working with the data. We contacted the authors and explained the need to revise part of the manuscript as it was missing a visual aid to accompany its data. After adding a table and table caption to the manuscript, we edited the short paper with the updated material. Authors 1 and 2 both saw a transformation in their writing, and as a result, were published in Volume III, Issue 1, and Issue 2, respectively.

Author 1 found the professional review and accompanying revision to be beneficial. They took our comments to heart and revised their writing with our words of advice. They had a more critical look at what data to present, which helped with word count and clarity. We edited portions of the original with less vigor and changed language to improve clarity. For Author 2’s revised submission, we recommended they make a couple of minor formatting changes. We also strongly advised that they incorporate a visual aid to present the various data because they were discussing different data points and it was too convoluted without being visualized. After adding a table and describing it in the body, we removed repetition/redundancy, worked with the authors’ data, and edited as needed to reaffirm clarity.