buy the article critique online

buy the article critique online

The Impact of Online Article Critiques on Academic Writing

1. Introduction to Online Article Critiques

One of the popular genres of online article critiques is peer review reports, which graduate students have opportunities to write their research proposals and data analyses. These so-called Article Critiques, or CRITS, serve for writers to plan, organize, and independently discuss online articles in class after the deadline of their web-based concurrent article critiques. Although online article critiques have been widely used at university levels in North America and in the UK, there is a scarcity of studies that have investigated the impact of online article critiques on this context. The points of frequently considered pedagogical benefits of online article critiques, which include the enhancement of learners’ understanding of article content, article critique refining, critical thinking, community-building, and writing skills, are quite relevant to various aspects of academic writing.

Academic writing is believed to be a dominant mode of scholarly communication which students and scholars have to master for their higher studies. Academic writing needs commentary and feedback for the writings to revise and improve by the author. To this end, teachers, students, and researchers have responded to online article critiques as written feedback to one’s writing. Many studies on online article critiques have shown or claimed their effectiveness in assisting academic writing and revision. By reading, understanding, and critically evaluating several online article critiques, writers can become more aware of the academic writing conventions in their specialized fields and, over time, improve their scholarly papers.

2. Benefits of Utilizing Online Article Critiques

The use of online critiques, such as blogs, wikis, and online data repositories, also makes access to secondary texts on students’ scholarly articles and creative nonfiction stories more available to more members of the larger scholarly community. As articles and stories are posted, anyone interested in the publication and the response of a community can access the text. In this way, the use of online critiques allows for scholars to receive informal preliminary feedback before giving their work to a more formal and exclusive reviewing process. Moreover, online critique is timelier than other forms of critique allowing for immediate response from the scholar-writer.

Online article critiques have the potential to greatly improve the refinement and development of academic writing. As students and scholars respond to writing beyond the peer-reviewed article or book, their ideas become more fully realized and their argumentation tends to strengthen. When a text is critiqued, scholars must reflect on responses, thereby honing critical and creative approaches to the argumentation. Due to the inherent collaborative nature of critique, scholars become more connected with one another. A multitude of perspectives supports understanding among academic communities while simultaneously informing the scholar’s future thought and writing. Additionally, even if a writer does not respond to every critique point, the critiques themselves allow him to add breadth and depth to his knowledge on the particular subject in ways that could not have been possible without these responses.

3. Challenges and Criticisms of Online Article Critiques

It can also be difficult for someone who is not a subject expert or who is new to the area to judge the quality and validity of articles based on the number of critiques provided. For example, some people might choose to ignore two necessarily hostile critics if they have already made up their mind about a politician or are particularly looking forward to a holiday advertised in a newspaper, but the verdicts of thirty or forty hostile critics might carry a lot more weight in the holidays that the online travel sites offer. Who, however, has time to trawl through forty online critiques of a holiday article in order to know whether it is safe to book? Like the leisure product in the example, journal articles should also be safe, and this concern is not lost on those of us who are bioethicists. The Internet has revolutionized the publishing and critique process. It does not mean, however, that what gets published in cyberspace is subject to less scrutiny or criticism.

The effectiveness of online article critiques can be questioned. The validity of article critiques in general can be questioned, and it is not clear that online article critiques raise any new issues or problems that have not already been addressed in print journals. There can be question marks over the cars and credibility or reliability or validity of online article critiques, as many of these are anonymous and readers do not know if the reviewers are sympathizers, detractors or disinterested. It is also difficult to know how much weight should be given to a large number of critics or, indeed, to a small number of critics. A large number could demonstrate an article’s importance or interest to a readership but it could also reflect fears among that same readership about the safety of a given drug or the appropriateness of a service.

4. Best Practices for Engaging with Online Article Critiques

While they are not gospel, they can help you decide which critiques are worth attending to. The team of authors used these criteria or partly consider them when deciding which critiques to attempt to address. In evaluating critiques from just these three selections, we weigh the following concerns: the soundness of the evidence. How seriously should I take this critique? What is the plausibility of its evidence or logic as matters of concern to others? the importance of the critique. If true, how important or damaging is it to my case? the fixability of the critique. Can I address this weakness in my article? If so, how? If not, why not?

Get a feel for the critiques you receive by identifying the three heaviest critiques. Were the critiques careful, thoughtful, and well-evidenced, or are they sloppy, incoherent, or downright mean-spirited? Take a moment to visit and critique some papers beyond your assigned 3. Do the same at different times. Have criteria in mind, such as: soundness of argument, originality, or clarity of expression. On a respectful forum, are early critiques at all times styled to be constructive, yet truthful: critical and not fawning, but courteous, and genuinely concerned to help the reader and author find weaknesses in the paper? Start a thread on the Open Road to respond to a recent critique to one of your papers. Be it constructive, engage it in a collegial way, making clear your assumptions and goals. The goal is to make sure that by the time a response has been shared, the critic knows that you’ve read the critique carefully and have genuinely engaged with the ideas therein.

Interested in being critiqued? Not sure whether to pay attention to the criticisms you receive? This section outlines the original research team’s best practices for how to effectively engage in and make use of online article critiques. It’ll help you and others make the most of your critique and ultimately work to improve your research. In considering these tips, also strive to be a good digital citizen in this online community, by treating the person who wrote the article as a human behind the keyboard, creating and critiquing in good faith, among other concerns.

5. Conclusion and Future Implications

Our study raises as many questions as it answers. We hope that further empirical investigation can be conducted to either validate or problematize our findings. Additionally, we may eventually need a new print paradigm that expands alongside camera-ready critique alternatives. It may be interesting to explore, eventually, if a journal’s adoption of online critiques had any real or perceived effect on revisions, engagement, or citation count of published articles. At the moment, we can infer inclusion from our own database and encourage the performance of a large-scale bibliometric analysis. So that the study more fully takes the record, we also encourage researchers to conduct quantitative replication studies of these results on a larger dataset.

We set out in this article to reconceptualize the genre of online article critiques, uncover the potential impacts of online article critique discussion content on revision in season publishing, and investigate what members believe to be the affordances and constraints of this method of scholarly interaction. Based on our suggestions, our article lays out specific guidelines and research questions for scholars who may be interested in adopting this practice. We believe that, in addition to these practical outcomes, the article also has conceptual implications. We hope that it might shift the conversation about online article critiques from one that primarily focuses on supporting early career researchers in what can be a confusing and challenging time, to one that argues, on the basis of qualitative observation, that these forums may in fact have substantive effects on academic writing and scholarly communication.