cheap speech writers services for phd

cheap speech writers services for phd

Exploring the Impact of Cheap Speech Writing Services on Academic Integrity in PhD Programs

1. Introduction to the Phenomenon of Cheap Speech Writing Services

The problem of cheap speech writing services’ impact on students’ academic performance, universities’ reputation, and industries’ expectations is multilayered. Surprisingly, there have been few studies related to the ethical implications of purchasing academic papers. Also, it is uncommon to find relevant studies in developing countries. Furthermore, it is even unheard of to come across a study related to the research area in transition countries. Collectively, it emphasizes the desire for a better understanding of the study factors explored below, such as the concept of purchasing academic papers on the internet, the cost of these services, prevalence and frequency of use, reasons students use these services, and the potential social impacts as seen through the university. Knowing these attitudes can help educators prevent students from becoming involved in the use of these services.

Cheap speech writing services are very popular. Not only are they affordable to the general public, but there are also numerous services that can be found on the web by a simple search. The promises these speech writing services deliver to customers are impressive. For instance, they can deliver that “in addition, our cheap speech writing service is quite innovative, as we not only provide when you buy an outline or sample as our competitors do – we also encourage you to use yourself as a reference as well!” Students and professionals, however, should be aware of the integrity issues related to plagiarism and bureaucracy.

2. Ethical and Academic Integrity Implications of Using Cheap Speech Writing Services in PhD Programs

Some folks might see no major ethical qualms outsourcing this kind of work. Regarding academic integrity: doing this work together can greatly improve our speeches’ quality, and we will still present them in our own voices in the room, as a consequence of learning by discussing ideas related to our research. The push not to use a cheap vendor might instead wholeheartedly stem from whether the practice undermines the already-rigged-with-rat-races process of developing our scholarly identities and visibility. It is plausible that the bar to be seen and heard would actually be a bit too low by using some of these vendors, or that using them paints equal “not-serious-ness” susceptibility across the community. Isn’t it possible that a community could, as a practice through informal hearings and whisper networks, rank one of my colleagues as more prepared and serious because of engagement with me? While that also might reflect poorly on the community, this question has certainly at least crossed my mind.

Using cheap speech writing services can raise troubling ethical issues within your PhD community. It can be hard to turn down, but here are some things to consider and discuss with people in your PhD program. This blog is meant to provide you with information that could be helpful when discussing this issue with your advisors, fellow students, or PhD program directors. Weigh the academic integrity, scholarly development rat races, and future quality-of-education implications first!

3. Strategies for Universities to Combat the Proliferation of Cheap Speech Writing Services

Finally, universities can require students to sign a declaration at the end of every portion of the course and before obtaining a final degree that they have not been involved in cheap speech writing services and to declare the use of these services at the time of application for the final degree, certificate, and so on. Universities can also develop a specific office of ethical affairs to investigate the causes and effects of this phenomenon, support faculty working in this area, and distribute grants to such faculty to investigate this issue in-depth. They might also establish a policy of awarding bonus points to students who report that other students are using these services, particularly if a faculty member’s proposal of a bonus points system is incorporated. Ideally, this policy should have a non-retaliatory clause that would reduce or insulate a student’s anxiety or fears about speaking out. The seriousness of this threat to ethical and educational excellence is unprecedented in many ways because no studies describe how widespread the use of these essay writing services are currently, so there are as yet no statistical estimates of the precise use of these services among students. Outcome data from class begins to address this gap, but more comprehensive studies are needed to determine the size and scope of this problem.

Universities can also require students who recently applied to a PhD program to have their entrance application essays (in addition to standard transcripts, test scores, etc.) composed during an in-person visit to the campus and check their current writing and speaking capabilities. They could require a writing sample composed in a controlled (in-person) writing environment, perhaps speaking with potential applicants directly concerning their writing sample.

Universities can adopt a variety of strategies to mitigate the increasing intrusion of cheap speech writing services, including: educational efforts for students, teaching and awareness-raising on ethical issues in graduate programs; increased efforts in tracking, special attention to identified indicators, including language and writing proficiency; using turn-it-in and iThenticate at the gate; academic honesty policy, lawsuit as cheating; requiring annual disclosure of such services to identify those students who might have hired the services.

4. Case Studies and Examples of Universities Addressing the Issue

A small number of detailed case studies appear in the published literature which explore the actions of specific institutions in response to contract cheating. These are of particular value to the academic and support community alike. The District University example by Lang (2011) is one of the clearest and most detailed accounts of the link between the sources provided by students or returned to them without processing and contract cheating. The case gives an insight into the comment and guidance as well as the disciplinary policy that was developed to tackle the behaviour. In 2010, Professor Teresa Fishman worked with UC Davis to develop a Case Study that was used by the Higher Education Academy in the UK for use in their materials on contract cheating. In the case study, Fishman references that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has a division called the Academic Integrity and Contract Cheating Task Force. The FBI sought Professor Fishman’s advice. Despite the expert attention and the peer review associated with this case study, it is not referenced in the scientific literature. Instead it is used by the public sector, and wrap-around programs and government policies related to academic integrity.

In the academic literature and policy documents, the most frequently recommended interventions to address the issue of cheap speech writing services at the institutional level are awareness raising among teaching staff and students and development of innovative assessment methods. Many institutions have campaigned against contract cheating in various ways, for example by hosting awareness-raising events, inviting contract cheating survivors to tell their stories, providing teaching resources for academic staff, and many more. Actions such as these are likely to have been motivated by a latent sense among staff that commissioning ghostwritten material constitutes a form of cheating, even in instances where the final submission has been modified or rewritten so that it no longer resembles the original.