how to answer business law essay questions

how to answer business law essay questions

Strategies for Answering Business Law Essay Questions

1. Introduction to Business Law Essay Questions

A business law essay question need not necessarily be answered in the keyword. It is a good idea to spend time to understand the implications of the essay question. By the essay subject, a student will know if the essay is of the paradigm type or the concept type. However, the keywords in an essay may be either missing or may have overlapping significance. Therefore, one must not take them too literally. Even if the facts are given in a question, they must necessarily be converted to some paragraphs. Often, it may require a few additional facts to be added to the one given in the question. For instance, if the facts refer to a person killed in an air crash, it will require details like which airline, nationality of the plane, position of the crash to arrive at a logical conclusion to the answer. The same question can hold good for the polled bribery case.

Understanding a question is the first step in answering it. This may sound obvious, but the point is often missed by law students, leading to them providing answers irrelevant to the set questions. An examiner (or reader) of your answer script does not need peripheral replies, which may include well-known statements and details, or the learned moots, obiter dicta, or earned footnotes. Answers must be precise and pertinent; any unnecessary matter will only digress and impair the quality of your answer. Business law essay questions are generally based on facts. These facts can be real (as in problem questions) or hypothesized (concept-oriented essay questions).

2. Understanding the Question and Identifying Key Issues

Both instances in the situation must be mentioned. The facts in Karen’s circumstances there are very similar, so they can focus. Even if each situation were not to be noticed, try to find someone who was ultimately underemployed. By finding the key term one occasionally helps. The phrase “under-utilisation” in one case implies that under-employment is checked for in the other. Where a group of people could express the views of various company entities, do so. Set out in separate stage differ. It does, therefore, want particular attention. Would be said analysis of a right under a common morality that goes on with the manager of others.

The immediate step in addressing business law essay questions in the BCL and HMIC is comprehending the question, understanding what is requested, and having an answer to two questions. In the scenario, for example, what is discussed? What problems appear, who is the head of the discussion, or perhaps the most at fault is examined, or perhaps how can such issues be stopped? It also checks comprehension and analysis. These questions were then split into more detailed ones: What rules are offered? What more, if any, would like these regulations to be inserted or evicted? Upon finding and marking the question, a brief review should be made.

3. Structuring Your Answer Effectively

The body of your answer will be made up of a series of discussions of key points and their application to the problem situation. It is essential that your answer is logically structured and coherent. You may wish to consider some of the following aspects in your answer.

2) The body of your answer

1) Introduction: Your introduction should be brief but informative. It should indicate the topic that you propose to cover in your answer, the issues you have identified, and the order in which you will discuss them. Some may even advise giving the answer to the question in the introduction so that the reader knows immediately where your essay is going. I am not convinced this is always necessary, and it’s usually overused. If you know exactly what you are doing in your essay and are confident that yours is the best answer, then it may be worth considering. However, as an occasional marker, I am always suspicious that the writer may fall short of simply or imperfectly repeating what is said in the introduction. Don’t use a “sledgehammer to crack a nut.”

The requirements of the question and the facts (those given and others you have assumed) will govern the overall structure of your answer. There are, however, a few “rules of thumb” that apply to all questions and that can help in formally structuring the internal organization of the various components of your answer.

4. Structuring your answer effectively

4. Utilizing Case Law and Statutory Interpretation

Statutory interpretation cannot be identified without referring to an Act and using cases to explain what words in the Act mean. Thus, candidates are able to bring in their case law in response to their interpretation of the Act. It is not enough to simply state that one section of the Act must be interpreted in a certain manner without having something to prove this. When answering essay questions on topics relating to the law, concentrate on the relevant legal authorities, particularly case law, and have them labelled and tagged ready for easy retrieval in the exam. Use these cases to pinpoint the important issues, the relevant law, and to act as signposts through your answer. Case law therefore can be pivotal in identifying the state of the law, providing an analysis and comparison between the cases, and then by applying key principles together with the court’s judgments. When providing a case study or reference, it must be relevant to the specific fact pattern and the law in question.

In order to answer business law essay questions with precision and depth, it is important that candidates develop their ability to situate the issues and activate legal analysis. One of the simplest ways to create depth in an argument, thereby lengthening the amount of time it takes to develop and discuss it, is to support statements with relevant case law and statutory interpretations. Using case law does not need to be all the time or for every statement, but by looking to existing legal authority candidates display a greater understanding of doctrine and commercial law.

5. Concluding Your Answer with Impact

Special attention should be paid to the last paragraph. This is the last impression that the marker has: like a collection of short stories, the last one has to pack a punch. It really should not be an afterthought. Avoid the pedestrian ‘in conclusion’, or ‘so we see that…’. Let your imagination off the leash and give the conclusion impact. It brings both reader and writer a belated blast of oxygen in your race to the end of the word count. Play, twist, persuade, entertain. Finally, don’t ignore it at the end: if you have used a heading, do not forget to number the paragraphs within that heading, so the marker can find section 11.5 easily. All parties should now have a comprehensive plan of how to answer law essay questions. Techniques for examination and revision are covered in the final section of this essay.

The most forgotten about area of your answer is a strong, concise conclusion. Your four-page essay deserves a proper ending: not a shy tapering off into the mists of time! You have structured your answer in a particular way, but by the time markers reach Section 4, the reader may well have forgotten what the case was about. Repeating the critical facts and central issues is a great introduction to the conclusion. Your readers need reassurance that you have not merely been building castles in the air: remind them of what matters, and they will be forced to acknowledge your methodology.