example of an article critique

example of an article critique

An In-Depth Guide to Writing an Effective Article Critique

1. Introduction to Article Critiques

Writing an article critique is different from writing a regular article. When writing the critique, you should read the article that you are critiquing very carefully. Take note of all the important points and use the accepted form of notation, which will give you a guideline on how to evaluate the article. Get all the necessary information about the author and research their history, because some of the articles may be influenced by their standpoints. Then you should start by making a general critique of the article which should only be a research of the article in general. You will then need to go into a thorough critique of the article. When you are carrying out this process, you should also keep in mind the perceptions and beliefs of your readers. Ensure that your article critique shows how each of the standpoint related to their perceptions.

When you are enrolled in a college or university, article critiques are something that you cannot escape. You will be assigned this task for different articles for different subjects several times. It is always very important that when you are undertaking this kind of task, you need to exhibit the highest level of understanding and interpretation of the article. You will need to highlight the various strong and weak points of the article that you are working on. When you are writing this kind of task, you need to go into details about how different events are portrayed in the article and how the different issues emanating from the piece have been dealt with by the author. You will need to incorporate a high level of critical thinking and analysis to ensure that your article critiques are clear and precise.

2. Understanding the Purpose and Importance of Critiques

The article critique is a genre of scholarship. Scholarship is a process that begins with exploration and curiosity, moves to the operation of formal research, and proceeds to advancement and peer critique. Likewise, the critique of a formal research article is a pathway to knowledge. It is a scholarly process in which students demonstrate their ability to analyze and interpret in the pursuit of deeper understanding of an issue. In fact, critique is the act of measuring a scholarly work against established criteria, a recognized practice that is essential for progress in all fields of scholarship. When students produce an article critique, they are engaging in the scholarly examination of an article. The process equips students with the foundational skills needed to skillfully select, digest, analyze, interpret, critique, publish innovatively, and effectively evaluate informatic and health technologies throughout their life.

At some point in life, everyone is asked to critique articles. Students at all levels are frequently assigned article critiques. Likewise, professionals in all fields critique articles. The critique is so integral to the scholarly enterprise that it is necessary to recognize its importance to society. Scholars share their research with others through articles in professional and academic journals. The critique is a form of growth aid, and essentially every article published in a scholarly journal has been critiqued during the peer-review process by experts in the field. The critique is also a professional growth aid because experts critique the articles of experts. Growth through critique is not reserved for the novice.

3. Key Elements to Include in an Article Critique

Overall, these guidelines should be used in order to understand the expectations, structure, outline, and manner in which to prepare an effective article critique. It is also important to be concise and clear. These elements will contribute to the critique’s overall tone and meaning.

Lastly, the research should be reviewed critically. The researcher’s main objections and highlights should also be mentioned in the context of the articles. Lastly, any implications should be included in a brief.

Critical Review

The researcher should mention any other contributions of the article, recommendations, topics, and any other aspects that appear to be unnoticed.

Recommendations

The limitations section should be written with the review’s audience in mind; said limitations should also be described.

Limitations

The researcher should discuss any results after a detailed summary of the article is provided. It is also important to mention any methods used and include descriptions of the data, such as the results.

Results

Before requesting the review of a certain article, the author should consult the Major Paper List or other previous works that are not included in said critique. The researcher should also familiarize themselves with the author’s major works and other related aspects, in addition to becoming familiar with the author’s major works. The researcher should include a brief analysis of the author’s works in their review. It is important to note the importance related to the presented article as well. Other related works and the evaluation of others should also be included. It is useful to read the source, as this can give you useful and credible insights into the matter.

Literature

The critique may be written with the author and its main purposes and objectives in mind. The main objective and the purpose of the article being critiqued should be identified, lastly.

Objective

In the introduction, the aim and any related background information should be provided. It is also important to state the main objective of the paper in the introduction. This may be relevant to the data, research, analysis, and any other piece of information that the reviewer believes is pertinent to the critique. The author’s knowledge, insight, and perspective should also be included. It is important to mention any other articles that the author has written as well. Rudimentary research on the topic should be conducted prior to drafting any related descriptions or citations.

Introduction

As with other academic papers, the article critique should be error-free grammatically and should be concise. An abstract is usually written for small academic texts, but it is not to be included in major works such as the article critique. Common sense should also be employed when citing the necessary material, i.e., an introduction, a thesis statement, and related criticism.

Abstract

The title, as with the title of the article that is being critiqued, should be brief and concise. It is important to mention the title of the article which one is critiquing. Including the name of the author and any important works is also necessary.

Title

In an article critique, one needs to provide a comprehensive summary of what the article is about. The aim is also to determine whether or not the evidence of the study is accurate, i.e., if there are any biases or any study design issues. Consider the following elements that should be included in the critique to write a comprehensive piece.

4. Structuring Your Critique for Clarity and Coherence

The first paragraph should present the general understanding and perceptions that the article’s arguments are based on or reflect. This paragraph gives the understanding of the state of science in respect to the main topic of the paper and highlights the main problem and the author’s possible position.

Your critique should present its main points in the order of your paragraphs. Understanding this order will enable your readers to follow your ideas efficiently and effectively. Begin your critique with an introduction. In the introduction, you should provide a brief and clear summary of the perceptions or assumptions behind the work you are critiquing so that your readers have a firm understanding of the article and its work. You should also inform readers of the context of the critique, particularly for whom and for what it is being made, as this sets the stage for the rest of the work. Finally, you should include a thesis statement that provides your general opinion of the piece so that your readers understand its main or central point. After the introduction, the body of your critique should contain several paragraphs, depending on how long of an article you decide to use. Each paragraph should address only one topic or issue so that its meaning or content is clear to the reader.

5. Tips for Providing Constructive Feedback and Analysis

Reviews should highlight what the manuscript adds to a field, not just dissect what it doesn’t do: Identifying what the researcher omitted in the manuscript may be important, but that is not your primary objective. Given that most papers have word limits and extensive appendices and online supplements are facilitated by some but not all journals, it is safe to assume most papers end up being shorter than the story they wish to tell. Do not penalize a researcher for carefully curating their manuscript. Focus on writing reviews that highlight positive and negative aspects of a paper, and remember any deficiencies that cannot be addressed in a reasonable revision may be more appropriately given less weight in your evaluation of the paper. In other words, a small oversight may result in a small change in the paper’s perceived importance.

Be professional and use diplomacy: Being argumentative will only create resistance to your feedback. Provide critical feedback in a polite manner and always include suggestions for improvement. Start with praise: Dish out praise about things done well before diving into what could be done better. For example, “The author clearly worked hard.” Choose your words and phrasing carefully, and always sandwich the bad between two goods. “I’m glad… I’m complaining… I wished…” This is a fair and friendly way to express your thoughts. Use “I” statements: When providing critical feedback, use “I” statements to reflect your opinion or provide alternate ways to look at things.