sample article critique

sample article critique

Effective Strategies for Writing a Comprehensive Article Critique

1. Introduction to Article Critiques

Factors linking the author’s interpretations to other studies are highlighted. Any major theoretical concepts presented are summarized in the article using appropriate research language. The context in which the article was written is provided, which provides the reader with insight into the difficulty and originality of the ideas presented. The author is given appropriate recognition in the context of other studies. Any problems or limitations in the study are recognized. Finally, the article critique’s role is to gently guide readers and their peers. Provide first a critical summary of the article in your own words and then obtain reference material or content to support your critique. These are some of the ways a good review is formed. Every good review provides insight through answering your question, which sets the tone and sets the terms of reference for readers of the critique.

The main goal of an article critique, as with other types of critiques, is to guide the author’s and other readers’ understanding and appreciation of the article. The author’s reasoning is considered and an alternative viewpoint is presented. Both the criticisms and assurance of the article are evident, as well as the article’s classification. Its major strengths and weaknesses are noted. Also included are an evaluation of the article’s significance and the meaning of the work done. The author of the critique then has the responsibility to express his/her own expert viewpoints. Advice for future research should be included. It is also important for the article critique to present the amount of information available on the selected subject.

2. Key Components of a Well-Structured Critique

The first section of a critique should contain the author’s name, the title of the article, and the essential bibliographic information about the article. This section is the general citation of the article. A title on a critique is the same title as the article being critiqued. The second section should contain the introduction. The introduction is the most important part of the critique. In the introduction, you should first introduce the article being critiqued. You then need to describe the reasons why you are identifying specific faults or shortcomings in the article. By discussing the article and supporting evidence in the critique’s introduction, you do not undermine the author’s views in the article. Including evidence helps support your position but does not totally agree with the article being critiqued.

An article critique (critique) is a standard assignment for English Composition 101 and English Composition 102 students. The purpose of a critique is to express your judgment or evaluation of an author’s work in a detailed, concise, and integrative summary. A critique is written when you want to describe an analysis. An article critique should contain an introduction, a brief summary, and your stated opinion. An article critique should also contain well-reasoned research findings and statements to support your thesis. In addition, your critique should offer suggestions for an author who wants to develop his work more specifically or more comprehensively.

3. Analyzing the Research Methods and Findings

Also, the descriptive statistics in this article should be reported as percentages instead of numbers. If the real levels of these variables were overseen or not equal to 100%, further examination would fail to provide useful data. Measures of central tendency should be percentages instead of means or medians. Data analysis methods in the results and discussion parts of the quantitative study did not seem sufficient for the goals of the paper. Topics relating to each research aim should be separately and specifically examined in the data analysis methods. The authors should report percentages, mean scores, standard deviation scores, t-test, or chi-squared results for the steel samples. The results are difficult to evaluate without more thorough data analysis. Interpretation of the results should be avoided without an explanation of the descriptive statistics of data in which groups would be first compared. Significant differences were reported but required further explanations.

The content of the study did not match all the stated research aims. Therefore, reflecting on the relationship or linkages between the literature review and the research questions would be difficult. Furthermore, a quantitative study should be appropriate when a study is conducted to explore or describe a particular phenomenon after the authors have identified the relationship between the key variables. However, using t-tests and chi-squared tests to compare the results between two groups means that this study is exploratory as the aim of association is inherently descriptive and aimed to explore the foundation of a further study. Cross-tabulation, chi-squared tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression models are appropriate for exploratory or summative purposes in quantitative studies. The aim of descriptive association can also be an endpoint in itself and might be the goal of the research itself. However, if this study is designed to confirm the phenomena identified in the literature review, clarify inconsistent results between previous studies, or verify the relationship between variables, it is a confirmatory study, rather than an explanatory study.

4. Evaluating the Strengths and Limitations of the Study

Evaluating the Strengths and Limitations of the Study The purpose of this assignment is to review a study for possible research problems. For this assignment, reviewed are current qualitative articles to identify gaps in the literature. All the articles are presumed to be peer-reviewed articles. The relationship between relevance to the research topic, necessary evidence, measurement and workability of the proposed study surrounding the literature, are discussed. It is expected that the magnitude of the results will be outlined and if appropriate, reasons for specific research problems will be identified as well as the implications for practice within nursing.

Critique Points – Is there clinical relevance? – Linkage from the research findings to current practice? – Will the findings influence healthcare practice? – Are the findings sufficiently robust? – Is there a clear indication for evidence-based practice?

Current Relevance to Healthcare The findings have implications for practice in patient care. The strength of the findings would indicate the significance to the practice decision.

Introduction The purpose of this assignment is to critically review a current article for its relevancy to practice. The article to be reviewed must be reporting qualitative research. The critique is intended to serve as an analysis of the reviewed research findings that would then influence a healthcare practice decision.

5. Conclusion and Recommendations for Future Research

In summary, the critique process contributes to a wider understanding of the ability of research in nursing to affect the improvement of health and quality of life as well as the efficient and effective use of resources. Understanding the key aspects of an adequate review of hypothesis-generating or testing research is important. In addition to increasing the comprehensibility of an investigation, knowing the strengths and limitations of a study provides a forerunner to other aspects, such as determining usefulness of the result, or making findings relevant to the population of interest possible. It is important to help students entering nursing programs at either the undergraduate or graduate level to understand the key elements of what comprises an adequate critique and to facilitate their acquisition of this skill.

During the current literature search, alternative models or additional aspects of the article critique process were identified which could not be located within the critique framework. A well-delineated review of operational definitions was often missing. Suitability of the finding for predictor use, examination of different types of validity, particularly logical inference and criterion-related validity, clarity of model specifications, flexibility of design for use in other parts of the research with the same or different groups, and inclusion of higher order interaction were recommended for further evaluation. Additional related issues include: manuscript instruction about documenting the use and type of reliability analysis, noting predictor and criterion variable scales of measurement, examining correct sample sizes, and checking overall validity, ethical considerations, and implications drawn by the authors.

The sooner individuals feel comfortable with and have mastered the process of the critical examination of research, the better both the participants and the research process can function. Graduate level to understand the key elements of what comprises an adequate critique and to facilitate their acquisition of this skill.

In conclusion, the article critique provides an opportunity to evaluate the key elements of a scientific investigation. The ability to address such issues increases the capacity of nursing professionals to evaluate research. For example, identifying study strengths helps nurses determine whether the results can be believed. Construction of new models based on the results can help guide both practice and future research. Knowing specific short-term or long-term impacts that stem from certain clinical practices can be useful in decision making or in revising hospital policies.