buy argumentative essay online

buy argumentative essay online

The Ethics and Efficacy of Buying Argumentative Essays Online

1. Introduction to the Practice of Buying Argumentative Essays Online

In addition to these issues, a kind of sociological drama plays itself out in the conduct of the world market, specifically in the circulation of term papers laundering through the global marketplace and back to the nation-state. At the same time, customers and owners increasingly deny responsibility for the circulation of racially, sexually, religiously, and gender abusive materials. Lastly, only some of the political and ethical situations of these problems advocate a certain form of educational ethics will be examined. The term “paper” has always been consistently applied to term papers purchased for classes at the undergraduate or high-school level. However, nothing distinguishes usage of the term except its context. Important distinctions do exist. Educational ethicists and educators ought to concern themselves more with the virtues and responsibilities of both professors and students. After all, students do use term papers. It is not only the person offering the essay for sale who is at fault.

The topic must be controversial and debatable, providing substantial or convincing evidence, arguments, reasoning, and examples. Much has been written about the so-called essay-for-hire industry. Submissions to this essay contest reveal the depth of concern that various groups (students, professors, admissions officers, college/law enforcement authorities, the media) have about unprincipled and politically irresponsible behaviors within this industry. Concerns center around the fact that the industry might not be considered illegal because of its roots in the internet, its lack of recognition from authority (whether or not that circumstance is true), and the complicating fact that the industry is global. In response to developing technology, many of these groups advocate specific forms of technological fixes to the problems associated with term paper use. The effect of the fixing of such technologies is to draw students and professors increasingly closer to these educational tools.

2. Ethical Considerations Surrounding the Purchase of Academic Papers

Buy an argumentative essay on an environment that is as harmful and dangerous as purchasing them could be. Everyone should have the chance to develop themselves. It is ethically right that everyone has the freedom to think the way he or she wants, but, on the other hand, does not have the freedom to harm others and pretend that was an ethical choice. Everyone has the duty to make their ethical choices with a close perspective to those with whom we have interaction.

Ethics seem to have changed over the years. As we grow up, the children do as well. Many environments are discussed as the best one for the child to grow up. Although everyone has its own fault and each family educates its children the way they believe it would be better, are our different educations good to other? Could they be harmful to other? When do we skip individual rights to preserve collective rights? In this way, is education a base for ethical behavior? Everything is interconnected. Education can’t just be knowledge learning, because the content can have different kinds of information that such the child can grow up into a non-ethical adult. And one will go on the rout of life, transmitting the same concepts to those that will come after.

3. The Impact of Purchased Essays on Academic Integrity and Learning Outcomes

The students who feel comfortable with their ability to answer questions about their worth will be more comfortable with the risk of asking for a sign of appreciation in the form of the essay. There is no teacher who will ever put your academic ability in doubt if you are qualified. Distance education is an ever-expanding option that puts the lessons of a well-rounded employee out of the reach of many colleges and universities. It is very much a Catch-22 of the modern world. A paper which is written from scratch is unique; it will stand up well in any of your adult life, whether it’s a judgeship or a diary. With such peace of mind, today’s student would no longer need to plan to bring a gun to class.

As such, the decision to buy argumentative essay content is one that students should objectively consider and make on a case-by-case basis. There are various implications of choosing to buy a custom argumentative essay, but it is ultimately a personal decision that must fit within individual academic goals. There are various negative implications of not being able to submit a paper as a part of your coursework. For example, your coursework may account for a high percentage of your final grade. Due to the high stakes of employment, college attendance is increasingly practical and costly. In some cases, being able to secure a job upon graduation can be just a few honors off. With the costs of college increasing, the student must shoulder the role of determining the value of a particular major in terms of future employment opportunities.

4. Evaluating the Quality and Authenticity of Online Argumentative Essays

The conveyance of authenticity with an academic argument depends on the writer producing the essay because it is the writer who requires the necessary skills to engage in the trying activity of writing an argumentative essay. An irreplaceable component in argumentation is writer commitment, while others argue that writer commitment should be deemphasized. Characteristics of argumentative essays that authenticate the essay are the most compelling components to examine considering that all four elements are based primarily on writer commitment: unity, adequate support, clear organization, and specificity. After considering the listed characteristics needed to establish quality, the question arises: to what extent are these characteristics authentic, then, if they result from the expression of second-party belief? What differentiates the genuine essay from the inauthentic one? While it seems difficult to analyze multiple dimensions of authenticity of a single instance of argumentation, the significance of these questions remains. The function of these values is often seen as tests, used during the critical process. These tests are disaggregated, comprising argument examination, identification, or evaluation. Through endorsing this perspective, we are following an approach that is fundamentally epistemic: we are concentrating on tests of argumentation developed to assist people in guiding them when examining arguments (critical pluralism) rather than focusing on what argumentation is or on how it is taken for granted and used in ordinary social life (facilitative pluralism). Consequently, the bipolar facets of the values guiding argumentative practice become associated with a single pole of the critical dimension of argumentation. Thus, in the critical view, the characteristics of communication values demand the preservation of our communication heritage vested in argumentation. Our goal is to concentrate on the characteristics that maintain the integrity, reliability, and tranquility of individual and community argumentative practice.

At some point in time, a majority of high school students, undergraduate students, and graduate students have considered requesting help from an essay writing service. When a student’s academic reputation is called into question, discounting the credibility of an argumentative essay, the automatic response is to characterize the argumentation as dishonest – as is the case with writers of essays developed through such institutions. Argument, in this instance, relies on the presupposition that an argumentative essay is not authentic. Arguments having presuppositions that rely on shared values that are not actually shared by the writer and the reader call into question whether the argument is sincere. This is the case with argumentative essays that are written by a third party. Four criteria that establish quality with essay writing are the following: unity, specificity, adequate support, and clear organization. To what extent would an argument made by two students, which is identical, be negatively evaluated regardless of how each develops the argument in each of their own written essays? Furthermore, would each argument be equally valuable even though one essay does not effectively reflect the level of skill that it communicates, as in the case of an inauthentic argumentative essay created by an essay writing service?

5. Recommendations for Academic Institutions and Students

On the Internet, relevant information tends to be hidden in a mountain of relevant and irrelevant noise. By designing learning tasks together with suitable online interactions, our students are guided tacitly towards finding better justifications for their conclusions, drawn indirectly from insights and includes the use of high-quality online resources.

Academic institutions should: a) Promote academic ethics and discipline-specific discourse in course design and teaching. b) Make use of available websites to understand the language used by commercial sites. c) Be proactive in providing substantial problem-based learning environments. d) Make use of Turnitin plagiarism detection. e) Guide and direct students to higher quality and more appropriate online resources.

While many institutions are being proactive in implementing policies about the purchase and utilization of custom written essays from commercial sites, the question still remains, “Can we remove these questions proactively and provide a higher quality problem-based learning environment?” Teaching across most disciplines also draws directly and indirectly on argumentation and hence, it should be a primary candidate for inclusion in online interactive learning environments. Such environments provide rich, authentic problems in complex but controlled projects, and students typically build relevant background knowledge and accumulate experience to support the development and use of that knowledge. With well-designed, appropriate use of online forum technology, it may be possible to develop this type of knowledge and yet use methods online to counteract that abuse. In the following, we suggest recommendations for academic institutions and students based on our findings.