example of a journal article review

example of a journal article review

The Importance of Journal Article Reviews

1. Introduction

The importance of literature reviews to academic essays is so fundamental that it is critically important to have a good review for the essay as it provides good supporting content to the provided argument. Moreover, the result in formulating new ideas and knowledge resulting from an intimate familiarity and comprehension of the subject is essentially the success of an essay. A good review will lead to the best article, as it is through the review that the author will be able to come up with main points in the article. This effort is valued from numerous angles, for example, if it is for a student’s assignment, then through the review, it will lead to a better understanding of the assignment using it as preparation for understanding the lesson or material. At the same time, if it is for researchers, the said understanding will result in better solutions and suggestions for the topic, not to mention if it is for evidence-based practice or policy improving patient outcomes. The value of conducting the research hardly needs mentioning. It is only through research that changes in practice are brought. Practice has to change when it is evident that current methods are not effective, or that current practices detract from the desired patient outcomes. Published research is by and large the sole resource of evidence-based changes. This research is primarily in the form of articles published in journals. Journals are by far the most important source of keeping up with and staying in touch with the latest information in a field of study. Articles published are highly accessible and provide the most current and up-to-date information for any research inquired. Therefore, the worth of research cannot be underestimated, and this effort must, in the end, lead to changes for the better.

2. Summary of the Journal Article

An effective summary is a very accurate and concise piece of writing which is palatable and informative. It shouldn’t just repeat what the conclusions that the article reached, rather it should explain briefly what the main results are. The summary should also explain how these results benefit the overall area of research and what future implications the results will have. Finally, the summary should speak a bit about the methodology of the article and how the research was conducted. With the above criteria in mind, a good summary makes the next phase of the review process much easier.

The resultant tutorial will now present a summary of a journal article about process-drawing building tools. This summary is a foundational part of a good review because it will provide the reader with a comprehensive knowledge of the content of the article. Often a good summary will highlight all the most important aspects of the article including the research problem, the approach taken to solving the problem, major results and implications. By having a detailed summary, a reader can determine whether or not the article is relevant to his or her professional interests and worth reviewing.

3. Analysis and Evaluation

The review begins with a completely thorough summation and critique of the article in question. A terse question of what the author was investigating and why, which is possibly made up of several issues the author tried to address, usually uncovered near the end of the article. A consideration of how the article was obtained, showing premises and conclusions supported by evidence and reason, while avoiding the fallacy post hoc, ergo propter hoc. This should be followed by an examination of the article in relation to the course material and an evaluation in terms of the method of the article, and how much the article contributed to the research conducted in the field. A conclusion of how well the article succeeded in its endeavor and whether the article represents an asset to the field is then sought, and the review is completed by highlighting the answer to the questions provided in the analysis of the article.

Ultimately, a journal article review is a critical evaluation of a text’s strengths, limitations, and validity. A successful review is based on a clear understanding of the implications of the article, a well-thought-out evaluation, and a strong explanation and interpretation. Analysis and evaluation are considered the foundation of the review. Analysis refers to the process of breaking down something into its parts in order to understand how each part functions. An evaluative judgment is a value statement about the quality, merit, or desirability of an idea, a piece of evidence, a product, or a service. In analysis, one is determining what something is, while in evaluation, one is determining the quality of that thing. The analysis of the article should be through questions supported by the evidence in the text.

4. Implications and Recommendations

In light of the rampant usage of the term “user satisfaction” in the military, the findings could be utilized to identify and color weaknesses and strengths in systems and services ISO the user. It would be very advantageous to conduct a study to compare civilian and military user satisfaction to determine if the level of satisfaction within troops is greater or less than that of the civilian sector. This could also identify specific areas that may need improvement and provide a benchmark for progress. With the current trend and movement towards jointery, it is essential to identify similarities and differences in user satisfaction between the services. This would allow specific service cultures to be taken into consideration when providing joint service or when a service provider is contracted out to another service. An important point for future research of military user satisfaction is to identify how the satisfaction of the service member affects retention. With an extensive system of medical or dental care, for example, step two research could identify if customer satisfaction in these specific fields affects utilization of the service. If it is determined that it does, the tailored services would want to implement changes to increase satisfaction in efforts to improve utilization. Also, a comparison of point of care military consumers and those utilizing TRICARE services in the private sector should be performed. The authors of this essay would like to express the importance of not utilizing sole chief or ad hoc methods to sample the population of the military. The findings of this research can only be generalized to the entire military if a representative sample of the total military population is used. This, as well as the increasing electronic availability of military personnel, creates an opportunity for future research using web-based surveys to achieve higher response rates and survey efficiency.

5. Conclusion

When reviewing an article, one requires some basic skill to interpret and critique the data, this is something that is usually taught in most college level science classes. Finally, research cannot always be taken at face value. Unfortunately there is a large amount of research which has poor methodology; and studies that have conflicting results on the same topic. If the aim is to find the most effective intervention, one must weigh up the evidence and come to a conclusion on the best possible action. By applying evidence based practice, this may involve an ongoing process of continually searching, evaluating and synthesising research into the most comprehensive information on a given topic.

As mentioned, clients seek services from practitioners expecting that they will receive the most effective interventions available. Therefore, the best way to bridge to gap between research and practice, is to evaluate whether the information in the article contained proven most effective. Results which are positive can encourage a practitioner to implement a new intervention while results which are negative can encourage a practitioner to cease doing something and employ a different method.

The information contained within a journal article is a valid source on which to base current practice. Fortunately, nowadays many nurses and allied health practitioners are able to utilise academic and scholarly databases to obtain information regarding specific treatments and interventions. This information can be invaluable, assisting to improve, change or support current practice. Utilising resource such as the internet, it can be easy to access a plethora of information, much of which is anecdotal and not supported by empirical evidence. While some resources may be considered to have a wealth of expert opinion, anything that lacks scientific evidence should not be tested out in practice on patients, and should not form the basis of recommendations to clients.

It is important to stress the value of conducting reviews of journal articles. With the current increase in knowledge regarding evidence practice, it is essential that practitioners are able to access and interpret information to maintain up to date practice. The following reasons outline why it is essential to conduct reviews of journal articles.